Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 5;15(2):e0228376.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228376. eCollection 2020.

Chest CT in patients after lung transplantation: A retrospective analysis to evaluate impact on image quality and radiation dose using spectral filtration tin-filtered imaging

Affiliations

Chest CT in patients after lung transplantation: A retrospective analysis to evaluate impact on image quality and radiation dose using spectral filtration tin-filtered imaging

Alexander Wressnegger et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of a 150kV spectral filtration chest imaging protocol (Sn150kVp) combined with advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) on radiation dose and image quality in patients after lung-transplantation.

Methods: This study included 102 patients who had unenhanced chest-CT examinations available on both, a second-generation dual-source CT (DSCT) using standard protocol (100kVp, filtered-back-projection) and, on a third-generation DSCT using Sn150kVp protocol with ADMIRE. Signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) was measured in 6 standardized regions. A 5-point Likert scale was used to evaluate subjective image quality. Radiation metrics were compared.

Results: The mean time interval between the two acquisitions was 1.1±0.7 years. Mean-volume-CT-dose-index, dose-length-product and effective dose were significantly lower for Sn150kVp protocol (2.1±0.5mGy;72.6±16.9mGy*cm;1.3±0.3mSv) compared to 100kVp protocol (6.2±1.8mGy;203.6±55.6mGy*cm;3.7±1.0mSv) (p<0.001), equaling a 65% dose reduction. All studies were considered of diagnostic quality. SNR measured in lung tissue, air inside trachea, vertebral body and air outside the body was significantly higher in 100kVp protocol compared to Sn150kVp protocol (12.5±2.7vs.9.6±1.5;17.4±3.6vs.11.8±1.8;0.7±0.3vs.0.4±0.2;25.2±6.9vs.14.9±3.3;p<0.001). SNR measured in muscle tissue was significantly higher in Sn150kVp protocol (3.2±0.9vs.2.6±1.0;p<0.001). For SNR measured in descending aorta there was a trend towards higher values for Sn150kVp protocol (2.8±0.6 vs. 2.7±0.9;p = 0.3). Overall SNR was significantly higher in 100kVp protocol (5.0±4.0vs.4.0±4.0;p<0.001). On subjective analysis both protocols achieved a median Likert rating of 1 (25th-75th-percentile:1-1;p = 0.122). Interobserver agreement was good (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.73).

Conclusions: Combined use of 150kVp tin-filtered chest CT protocol with ADMIRE allows for significant dose reduction while maintaining highly diagnostic image quality in the follow up after lung transplantation when compared to a standard chest CT protocol using filtered back projection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Quantitative image quality assessment.
Example for the assessment of quantitative image quality of lung parenchyma by positioning a region of interest (ROI) and measuring Hounsfield units (HU) and image noise (standard deviation of the attenuation value). A) 3rd generation Sn150kVp protocol. B) 2nd generation 100kVp protocol.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Example images of the two protocols with corresponding DLP.
Images of both protocols with corresponding dose-length product (DLP). A) 3rd generation Sn150kVp protocol: DLP = 81.5 mGy*cm. B) 2nd generation 100kVp protocol: DLP = 208 mGy*cm.

References

    1. Ikonen T, Kivisaari L, Taskinen E, Piilonen A, Harjula AL. High-resolution CT in long-term follow-up after lung transplantation. Chest. 1997;111(2):370–6. Epub 1997/02/01. 10.1378/chest.111.2.370 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brenner DJ. Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer. Radiology. 2004;231(2):440–5. Epub 2004/05/07. 10.1148/radiol.2312030880 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Neroladaki A, Botsikas D, Boudabbous S, Becker CD, Montet X. Computed tomography of the chest with model-based iterative reconstruction using a radiation exposure similar to chest X-ray examination: preliminary observations. European radiology. 2013;23(2):360–6. Epub 2012/08/16. 10.1007/s00330-012-2627-7 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Robbins HY, Arcasoy SM. Malignancies following lung transplantation. Clinics in chest medicine. 2011;32(2):343–55. Epub 2011/04/23. 10.1016/j.ccm.2011.02.011 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee S, Yoon SW, Yoo SM, Ji YG, Kim KA, Kim SH, et al. Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between combined automatic tube current modulation and fixed tube current technique in CT of abdomen and pelvis. Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden: 1987). 2011;52(10):1101–6. Epub 2011/09/10. 10.1258/ar.2011.100295 . - DOI - PubMed

Publication types