Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Mar;8(3):292-308.
doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-19-0349. Epub 2020 Feb 5.

B cell-Derived IL35 Drives STAT3-Dependent CD8+ T-cell Exclusion in Pancreatic Cancer

Affiliations

B cell-Derived IL35 Drives STAT3-Dependent CD8+ T-cell Exclusion in Pancreatic Cancer

Bhalchandra Mirlekar et al. Cancer Immunol Res. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is an aggressive malignancy characterized by a paucity of tumor-proximal CD8+ T cells and resistance to immunotherapeutic interventions. Cancer-associated mechanisms that elicit CD8+ T-cell exclusion and resistance to immunotherapy are not well-known. Here, using a Kras- and p53-driven model of PDA, we describe a mechanism of action for the protumorigenic cytokine IL35 through STAT3 activation in CD8+ T cells. Distinct from its action on CD4+ T cells, IL35 signaling in gp130+CD8+ T cells activated the transcription factor STAT3, which antagonized intratumoral infiltration and effector function of CD8+ T cells via suppression of CXCR3, CCR5, and IFNγ expression. Inhibition of STAT3 signaling in tumor-educated CD8+ T cells improved PDA growth control upon adoptive transfer to tumor-bearing mice. We showed that activation of STAT3 in CD8+ T cells was driven by B cell- but not regulatory T cell-specific production of IL35. We also demonstrated that B cell-specific deletion of IL35 facilitated CD8+ T-cell activation independently of effector or regulatory CD4+ T cells and was sufficient to phenocopy therapeutic anti-IL35 blockade in overcoming resistance to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Finally, we identified a circulating IL35+ B-cell subset in patients with PDA and demonstrated that the presence of IL35+ cells predicted increased occurrence of phosphorylated (p)Stat3+CXCR3-CD8+ T cells in tumors and inversely correlated with a cytotoxic T-cell signature in patients. Together, these data identified B cell-mediated IL35/gp130/STAT3 signaling as an important direct link to CD8+ T-cell exclusion and immunotherapy resistance in PDA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: D.A.A.V. declares competing financial interests. He has submitted patents that are pending or granted that cover IL35 and is entitled to a share in net income generated from licensing of these patent rights for commercial development. He also consults for several biopharmaceutical companies.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. IL35 mediates activation of STAT3, suppression of IFNɣ, and chemotactic receptors CXCR3 and CCR5 in gp130+CD8+ T cells.
(A) Representative flow cytometry histograms (left) and quantification (right) of phospho(p)-STAT1, pSTAT3, and pSTAT4 in CD3+CD8+ T cells, activated with anti-CD3 (1 μg/mL) and anti-CD28 (2 μg/mL) in the presence of OVA (2 μg/mL) with and without recombinant (r)IL35 (50 ng/mL). Proportion of CD8+ T cells is indicated. (B) Representative flow cytometry plots and histograms (left) and quantification (right) of IFNɣ production and expression of CXCR3 and CCR5 in CD3+CD8+ T cells activated as in (A). (C) Representative flow cytometry histograms (left) and quantification (right) of pSTAT1, pSTAT3, and pSTAT in CD3+CD8+ T cells sorted for IL12Rβ2+ or gp130+ subsets (single-positive) activated as indicated in (A). Proportion of CD8+ T cells is shown. (D) Representative flow cytometry plots and histograms (left) and quantification (right) of IFNɣ production and expression of CXCR3 and CCR5 in CD3+CD8+ T cells sorted for IL12Rβ2+ or gp130+ subsets (single-positive) activated as indicated in (A). Proportion of CD8+ T cells is shown. Error bars indicate S.E.M.; p-values were calculated using Student’s t-test (unpaired, two-tailed); NS: not significant, *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. Experiment were conducted using 6–8–week-old C57B6 mice with 6 mice per group in triplicate. Data represents 3 independent experiments.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. STAT3 activation in CD8+ T cells is suppressive in vitro and in vivo.
(A) Representative flow cytometry plots and histograms of IFNɣ production and expression of CXCR3, CCR5, phospho(p)-STAT1, pSTAT3, and pSTAT4 in CD3+CD8+ T cells stimulated with anti-CD3 (1 μg/mL) and anti-CD28 (2 μg/mL) in the presence of OVA (2 μg/mL), and rIL35 (50 ng/mL) and/or STA-21 (20μM) inhibitor. Proportion of CD8+ T cells is indicated. (B) Quantification of IFNɣ production and expression of CXCR3, CCR5, pSTAT1, pSTAT3, and pSTAT4 in CD3+CD8+ T cells from (A). (C) Experimental schema used to test the role of Stat3 activation in CD8+ T cells. (D) Quantification of tumor weight from CD45.1+ mice 3 weeks post-orthotopic adoptive transfer of pre-treated with anti-CD3/CD28 with and without STA-21 CD45.2+CD8+ T cells and injection with KPC cells (n=6 mice/group). (E) Numbers (no.) of adoptively transferred CD45.2+ (left) and endogenous CD45.1+ (right) tumor-infiltrating CD3+CD8+ T cells 3 weeks post-orthotopic adoptive transfer to the CD45.1+ recipients indicated in (D). (F) Representative flow cytometry histograms (left) and quantification (right) of pSTAT1, pSTAT3, and pSTAT4 in intratumoral CD45.2+CD8+ T cells 3 weeks post-orthotopic adoptive transfer to CD45.1+ recipients indicated in (D). (G) Representative flow cytometry plots and histograms (left) and quantification (right) of IFNɣ production and expression of CXCR3 and CCR5 in intratumoral CD45.2+CD8+ T cells 3 weeks post-orthotopic adoptive transfer to CD45.1+ recipients indicated in (D). Error bars indicate S.E.M.; p-values were calculated using Student’s t-test (unpaired, two-tailed); NS: not significant, **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. Data represents 3 independent experiments.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. B cell–derived IL35 promotes tumor growth and mediates suppression of IFNɣ and chemotactic receptors CXCR3 and CCR5 in CD8+ T cells.
(A) Experimental schema used to generate tumor-bearing mixed bone marrow chimeras containing B cell–specific deletion of p35 (Bp35–/–) and corresponding control BWT mice. (B) Quantification of tumor weight from BWT and Bp35–/– mice 3 weeks post-orthotopic injection with KPC4662 cells (n=6 mice/group). (C) Representative flow cytometry histograms (left) and quantification (right) of intracellular p35 expression in intratumoral and intrasplenic CD19+CD21hiCD5+CD1dhi Bregs from mice in (B). Proportion of p35+ Bregs is indicated. (D) Representative flow cytometry histograms (left) and quantification (right) of intratumoral CD45+CD3+CD4+CD25 effector T cells in BWT and Bp35–/– mice from (B). (E) Representative flow cytometry plots (left) and quantification (right) of intracellular IFNɣ (Isotype; Rat IgG1, κ) and TNFα (Isotype; Rat IgG1, κ) expression by CD3+CD4+ intratumoral T cells from mice in (B). Proportion of CD4+ T cells is indicated. (F) Representative flow cytometry histograms (left) and quantification (right) of intratumoral CD3+CD4+Foxp3+ Tregs from mice in (B). Proportion of CD4+ T cells is indicated. (G) Representative flow cytometry histograms (left) and quantification (right) of intracellular p35 (Isotype; Rat IgG2a, ĸ) and IL10 (Isotype; Rat IgG2b, κ) expression by intratumoral CD3+CD4+ T cells from mice in (B). (H) Quantification of frequency of tumor-infiltrating CD45+CD3+CD8+ T cells from BWT and Bp35–/– mice from (B) determined by flow cytometry. (I) Representative flow cytometry plots (left) and quantification (right) of IFNγ (Isotype; Rat IgG1, κ) in intratumoral CD45+CD3+CD8+ T cells from mice in (B). (J) Ratio of mean CD3+CD4+CD25 effector T cells (Teff) to Tregs (left) and ratio of mean CD3+CD8+ cytotoxic T cells to Tregs (right) were calculated based on the percent-positive lymphocyte population determined by flow cytometry. Error bars indicate S.E.M.; p-values were calculated using Student’s t-test (unpaired, two-tailed); NS: not significant, **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. Data represents 3 independent experiments.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Production of IL35 by B cells impedes anti-PD1 therapy.
(A) Experimental schema used to generate tumor-bearing mice that contain B cell–specific deletion of Ebi3 (BEbi3–/–) and corresponding control BEbi3+/– mice. (B) Quantification of tumor weight from anti–PD-1–treated (200 μg) and IgG-treated (200 μg) BEbi3+/– and BEbi3–/– mice 3 weeks post-orthotopic injection with KPC cells (n=6 mice/group). (C) Quantification of tumor growth by ultrasound from BEbi3+/− and BEbi3−/− mice from (B). (D) Quantification of frequency of tumor-infiltrating CD45+CD3+CD8+ T cells from BEbi3+/− and BEbi3−/− mice from (B) determined by flow cytometry. (E) Representative flow cytometry plots of intratumoral CD45+CD3+CD8+ T cells stained for IFNγ (Isotype; Rat IgG1, κ) from mice in (B). (F) Quantification of intratumoral CD8+IFNγ+ T cells from all mice in (B). (G) Representative flow cytometry histograms (left) and quantification (right) of expression of CXCR3, CCR5, phospho(p)-STAT1, pSTAT3, and pSTAT4 in intratumoral CD3+CD8+ T cells isolated from BEbi3+/– and BEbi3–/– mice from (B). (H) Representative flow cytometry plots and histograms (left) and quantification (right) of IFNɣ production and expression of CXCR3, CCR5, pSTAT1, pSTAT3, and pSTAT4 in CD3+CD8+ T cells 48 hours after coculture with Breg cells in 1:1 ratio derived from the indicated mice. Experiment were done in triplicate with 6 mice each group. Error bars indicate S.E.M.; p-values were calculated using Student’s t-test (unpaired, two-tailed); NS: not significant, *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. Data represents 3 independent experiments.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. IL35 blockade relieves immunosuppression of CD8+ T cells and synergizes with anti–PD-1.
(A) Schematic of the antibody treatment regimen. Anti-IL35 (200 μg first dose followed by 100 μg per week) or control IgG antibody was administered in therapeutic schedule (1 week after tumor cell injection on days 7, 11, and 15). Administration of anti–PD-1 (200 μg) was initiated on day 7 after tumors reached approximately 4–5 mm in diameter. Two more doses of anti–PD-1 were administered on days 9 and 11. Mice were sacrificed 3 weeks post-tumor cell injection or assessed for survival. (B) Quantification of tumor weight from WT mice treated with therapeutic anti-IL35, anti–PD-1, or combination (as in (A)) 3 weeks post-orthotopic injection with KPC cells (n=6 mice/group). (C) Quantification of tumor growth by ultrasound from WT mice in (B). (D) Survival plot of orthotopically injected WT mice from (B) treated with the indicated therapeutic antibodies. (E) Quantification of tumor growth by ultrasound from spontaneous KPC mice treated with therapeutic anti-IL35, anti–PD-1, or combination as in (A). Treatment was initiated when tumor measuring ~5mm was visualized by ultrasound. (n=6 mice/group). Data represents 3 independent experiments. (F) Quantification of frequency of orthotopic tumor-infiltrating CD45+CD3+CD8+ T cells from mice in (B). (G) Representative flow cytometry plots of intracellular IFNγ in intratumoral CD45+CD3+CD8+ T cells from the mice in (B). Proportion of CD8+ T cells is indicated. (H) Quantification of intratumoral CD8+IFNγ+ T cells from the mice in (B). (I) Quantification of CXCR3, CCR5, pSTAT3, and pSTAT4 expression in intratumoral CD3+CD8+ T cells from mice in (B). Error bars indicate S.E.M.; p-values were calculated using Student’s t-test (unpaired, two-tailed); NS: not significant, **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. Data represents 3 independent experiments.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.. Identification of IL35-producing B cells in patients with PDA.
(A) Quantification of CD19+CD24hiCD38hi B cells in peripheral blood of healthy volunteers (n=30) and treatment-naïve PDA patients (n=30). Proportion of CD19+ cells is indicated. (B) Fold-change in Il10, p35, and Ebi3 from sorted CD19+CD24hiCD38hi Bregs or CD19+CD24loCD38lo Bcon cells from healthy volunteers or PDA patients (n=5 samples/B-cell group) determined by qPCR. Fold-change determined by comparing to healthy Bcon cells. (C) Fold-change in expression of Il10, p35, and Ebi3 from sorted CD19+CD24hiCD38hi Bregs in healthy donors or PDA patients determined by qPCR. (D) Representative immunofluorescence staining for CD8, CXCR3, and pSTAT3 in samples of human PDA. Arrow indicates pSTAT3+CD8+ T cells, arrowhead indicates pSTAT3CD8+ T cells, and asterisks indicate pSTAT3+CD8 cells. Scale bars, 25μm. (E) Proportion of Ebi3-high and -low tumor regions as a function of immune aggregates (IA). Data was derived from counting 3–6 field-of-view (FOV)/tumor sample (n=11 tumor samples). (F) Proportion of pSTAT3+CD8+ T cells as function of low vs. high numbers of Ebi3+ immune cells. Each data point is the percent of pSTAT3+CD8+ T cells out of all CD8+ T cells/20x FOV. Data was derived from counting 3–6 FOV/tumor sample (n=11 tumor samples). (G) Proportion of CXCR3+CD8+ T cells as function of low vs. high numbers of Ebi3+ immune cells. Each data point is the percent of CXCR3+CD8+ T cells out of all CD8+ T cells/20x FOV. Data was derived from counting 3–6 FOV/tumor sample (n=11 tumor samples). (H) Proportion of CXCR3+CD8+ T cells as function of pSTAT3+ vs pSTAT3 in tumor regions high for Ebi3+ immune cells. Each data point is the percent of CXCR3+CD8+ T cells out of all CD8+ T cells/20x FOV. Data was derived from counting 3–6 FOV/tumor sample (n=11 tumor samples). (I) Correlation of the cancer Breg signature with the cytotoxic CD8+ T-cell index in PAAD from TCGA. (J) Correlation of the cancer Breg signature with the cytotoxic CD8+ T-cell index across TCGA subtypes. Error bars indicate S.E.M., p-values were calculated using Student’s t-test (unpaired, two-tailed); NS: not significant, **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. Data represents 3 independent experiments.

References

    1. Spranger S, Koblish HK, Horton B, Scherle PA, Newton R, Gajewski TF. Mechanism of tumor rejection with doublets of CTLA-4, PD-1/PD-L1, or IDO blockade involves restored IL-2 production and proliferation of CD8(+) T cells directly within the tumor microenvironment. J Immunother Cancer. 2014;2:3. Epub 2014/05/16. doi: 10.1186/2051-1426-2-3. PubMed PMID: 24829760; PMCID: PMC4019906. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clark CE, Hingorani SR, Mick R, Combs C, Tuveson DA, Vonderheide RH. Dynamics of the immune reaction to pancreatic cancer from inception to invasion. Cancer Res. 2007;67(19):9518–27. Epub 2007/10/03. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0175. PubMed PMID: 17909062. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bailey P, Chang DK, Nones K, Johns AL, Patch AM, Gingras MC, Miller DK, Christ AN, Bruxner TJ, Quinn MC, Nourse C, Murtaugh LC, Harliwong I, Idrisoglu S, Manning S, Nourbakhsh E, Wani S, Fink L, Holmes O, Chin V, Anderson MJ, Kazakoff S, Leonard C, Newell F, Waddell N, Wood S, Xu Q, Wilson PJ, Cloonan N, Kassahn KS, Taylor D, Quek K, Robertson A, Pantano L, Mincarelli L, Sanchez LN, Evers L, Wu J, Pinese M, Cowley MJ, Jones MD, Colvin EK, Nagrial AM, Humphrey ES, Chantrill LA, Mawson A, Humphris J, Chou A, Pajic M, Scarlett CJ, Pinho AV, Giry-Laterriere M, Rooman I, Samra JS, Kench JG, Lovell JA, Merrett ND, Toon CW, Epari K, Nguyen NQ, Barbour A, Zeps N, Moran-Jones K, Jamieson NB, Graham JS, Duthie F, Oien K, Hair J, Grutzmann R, Maitra A, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Wolfgang CL, Morgan RA, Lawlor RT, Corbo V, Bassi C, Rusev B, Capelli P, Salvia R, Tortora G, Mukhopadhyay D, Petersen GM, Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome I, Munzy DM, Fisher WE, Karim SA, Eshleman JR, Hruban RH, Pilarsky C, Morton JP, Sansom OJ, Scarpa A, Musgrove EA, Bailey UM, Hofmann O, Sutherland RL, Wheeler DA, Gill AJ, Gibbs RA, Pearson JV, Waddell N, Biankin AV, Grimmond SM. Genomic analyses identify molecular subtypes of pancreatic cancer. Nature. 2016;531(7592):47–52. Epub 2016/02/26. doi: 10.1038/nature16965. PubMed PMID: 26909576. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Royal RE, Levy C, Turner K, Mathur A, Hughes M, Kammula US, Sherry RM, Topalian SL, Yang JC, Lowy I, Rosenberg SA. Phase 2 trial of single agent Ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) for locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Immunother. 2010;33(8):828–33. Epub 2010/09/16. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0b013e3181eec14c. PubMed PMID: 20842054. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brahmer JR, Tykodi SS, Chow LQ, Hwu WJ, Topalian SL, Hwu P, Drake CG, Camacho LH, Kauh J, Odunsi K, Pitot HC, Hamid O, Bhatia S, Martins R, Eaton K, Chen S, Salay TM, Alaparthy S, Grosso JF, Korman AJ, Parker SM, Agrawal S, Goldberg SM, Pardoll DM, Gupta A, Wigginton JM. Safety and activity of anti-PD-L1 antibody in patients with advanced cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(26):2455–65. Epub 2012/06/05. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200694. PubMed PMID: 22658128; PMCID: PMC3563263. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms