Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan:222:104882.
doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104882.

Horse vision and obstacle visibility in horseracing

Affiliations

Horse vision and obstacle visibility in horseracing

Sarah Catherine Paul et al. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Visual information is key to how many animals interact with their environment, and much research has investigated how animals respond to colour and brightness information in the natural world. Understanding the visibility of features in anthropogenic environments, and how animals respond to these, is also important, not least for the welfare and safety of animals and the humans they co-exist with, but has received comparatively less attention. One area where this is particularly pertinent is animal sports such as horseracing. Here there is a need to understand how horses see and respond to obstacles, predominantly fences and hurdles, as this has implications for horse and rider safety, however obstacle appearance is currently designed to human perception. Using models of horse colour and luminance (perceived lightness) vision, we analysed the contrast of traditional orange markers currently used on fences from 11 UK racecourses, and compared this to potential alternative colours, while also investigating the effect of light and weather conditions on contrast. We found that for horses, orange has poor visibility and contrast against most surroundings. In comparison, yellow, blue, and white are more conspicuous, with the degree of relative contrast varying with vegetation or background type. Results were mostly consistent under different weather conditions and time of day, except for comparisons with the foreground turf in shade. We then tested the jump responses of racehorses to fences with orange, fluorescent yellow, bright blue, or white takeoff boards and midrails. Fence colour influenced both the angle of the jump and the distances jumped. Bright blue produced a larger angle of takeoff, and jumps over fluorescent yellow fences had shorter landing distances compared to orange, with bright blue fences driving a similar but non-significant trend. White was the only colour that influenced takeoff distances, with horses jumping over white fences having a larger takeoff distance. Overall, our results show that current obstacle coloration does not maximise contrast for horse vision, and that alternative colours may improve visibility and alter behavioural responses, with the ultimate goal of improving safety and welfare.

Keywords: Animal welfare; Behaviour; Equine; Horse; Racing; Safety; Sports; Vision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A fence at Cheltenham racecourse on an overcast day to human and predicted horse vision. Images illustrate the much higher contrast of white, fluorescent yellow, and blue (in the colour boards) to the fence and its surroundings than the orange takeoff board and midrail.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Photos of all four colours of experimental fence used in the behavioural trials, on the right in human (jockey) vision and on the left in predicted horse vision. Fence colours are from top to bottom orange (traditional), white, fluorescent yellow, and bright blue.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a) Colour JNDs and b) Luminance JNDs of fence components (fence/midrail/take-off board) and alternative potential colours (white, yellow, and blue) against either the fence background/fence/fence foreground (turf), for horse vision under different light conditions (weather and time of day). JNDs are discrimination values from the horse colour and luminance (perceived lightness) models. These reveal how visible an object is predicted to be against a given background. Higher JND values indicate a colour is more visible.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The angle of takeoff for horses jumping over fences of the control (orange) or test colour (white, fluorescent yellow, or bright blue) split by the trial pair sequence and whether the fence was the first (1) or second (2) fence that the horse jumped in the pair of test fences. Colour of box indicates fence colour.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The landing distance (mm) of the front leading limb, front trailing limb, hind leading limb and hind trailing limb for horses jumping over fences of the control (orange) or test colour (white, fluorescent yellow, or bright blue) split by the trial pair sequence and whether the fence was the first (1) or second (2) fence that the horse jumped in the pair of test fences. Colour of box indicates fence colour.

References

    1. Albrecht G., Raewyn G., Phil M. Routledge; 2012. The Global Horseracing Industry: Social, Economic, Environmental and Ethical Perspectives.
    1. BHA Equine Injuries and Fatalities data for 2017 [WWW Document], n.d. URL https://www.britishhorseracing.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Equine-Inj... (accessed 9.19.18).
    1. Bizeray D., Estevez I., Leterrier C., Faure J.M. Effects of increasing environmental complexity on the physical activity of broiler chickens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2002;79:27–41.
    1. Bowmaker J.K., Dartnall H.J.A. Visual pigments of rods and cones in a human retina. J. Physiol. (Paris) 1980;298:501–511. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bruce V., Green P.R., Georgeson M.A. fourth edition. Psychology Press; Hove and New York: 2003. Visual Perception.

LinkOut - more resources