Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 10:20:122-124.
doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.01.005. eCollection 2020 Jul-Aug.

Patient characteristics do not predict the change in physical functioning following arthroplasty measured by the HOOS-PS and KOOS-PS

Affiliations

Patient characteristics do not predict the change in physical functioning following arthroplasty measured by the HOOS-PS and KOOS-PS

C Braaksma et al. J Orthop. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Predicting personalized outcome after arthroplasty improves shared decision-making. The aim of this paper was to determine predictors of functional outcome measured by the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Physical function Shortform (HOOS-PS) or Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Physical function Shortform (KOOS-PS) in patients undergoing total hip (n = 79) or total knee arthroplasty (n = 90) respectively. Patients were assessed at baseline and following arthroplasty. A multiple regression analysis showed that the included variables predicted the change score in HOOS-PS limited (F (8,66) = 3.139, p = 0.005, adjusted R2 = 0.188) and the KOOS-PS not significantly (F (8,73) = 0.837, p = 0.573, adjusted R 2 = -0.016). Concluding, baseline characteristics cannot be used for personalized prediction using the KOOS-PS and HOOS-PS.

Keywords: Arthroplasty; Functional outcome; HOOS-PS; KOOS-PS; Predictors.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Buirs L.D., Van Beers L.W.A.H., Scholtes V.A.B., Pastoors T., Sprague S., Poolman R.W. Predictors of physical functioning after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. BMJ open. 2016 Sep 6;6(9):e010725. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lingard E.A., Katz J.N., Wright E.A., Sledge C.B. Predicting the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Ser A. 2004 Oct;86(10):2179–2186. - PubMed
    1. W R.W., L T.S., J M.H. Predictors of hip pain and function in femoroacetabular impingement: a prospective cohort analysis. Orthop J Sport Med. 2017;5(9) http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id... Available from: - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rolfson O., Wissig S., van Maasakkers L. Defining an international standard set of outcome measures for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: consensus of the international Consortium for health outcomes measurement hip and knee osteoarthritis working group. Arthritis Care Res. 2016 Nov;68(11):1631–1639. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cin20&AN=119062275... Available from: - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davis A.M., Perruccio A.V., Canizares M. The development of a short measure of physical function for hip OA HOOS-Physical Function Shortform (HOOS-PS): an OARSI/OMERACT initiative. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2008 May;16(5):551–559. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources