Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 11;30(1):10.
doi: 10.1186/s41155-017-0065-9.

Brazilian study of adaptation and psychometric properties of the Coping Health Inventory for Parents

Affiliations

Brazilian study of adaptation and psychometric properties of the Coping Health Inventory for Parents

Regina Basso Zanon et al. Psicol Reflex Crit. .

Abstract

The Coping Health Inventory for Parents (CHIP) evaluates coping patterns of parents of chronically ill children and assesses different coping strategies using three subscales. This study aimed to translate and transculturally adapt the CHIP for a Brazilian sample and investigate the preliminary psychometrics of the scale. Rating scale Rasch analysis was performed on CHIP responses, and the psychometric performance of each of the three subscales was tested. Two hundred twenty parents of individuals with health problems participated in the study, answering a sociodemographic questionnaire-the Brazilian version of the CHIP-and Folkman and Lazarus's coping questionnaire. All items exhibited good fit to the measurement model, although response categories were not used as intended and little variability on person parameter estimates was obtained. These preliminary results suggested that each construct being measured by the three subscales should be treated separately, corroborating the theoretical model of the original instrument. Suggestions to address the psychometric limitations of the instrument were made in order to improve measurement precision.

Keywords: Coping; Measurement; Parents; Rasch analysis; Test validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Item-person map for the family dimension of the CHIP
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Item-person map for the support dimension of the CHIP
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Item-person map for the medical dimension of the CHIP

References

    1. Andrich D. A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika. 1978;43(4):561–573. doi: 10.1007/BF02293814. - DOI
    1. Araujo RB, Pansard M, Boeira BU, Rocha NS. As estratégias de coping para o manejo da fissura de dependentes de crack. Revista HCPA. 2010;30(1):36–42.
    1. Benson JE. Reevaluating the “subjective weathering” hypothesis: subjective aging, coping resources, and the stress process. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 2014;55(1):73–90. doi: 10.1177/0022146514521214. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bond T, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model. Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. 3. New York: Routledge; 2015.
    1. Borsa JC, Damasio BF, Bandeira DR. Adaptação e validação de instrumentos psicológicos entre culturas: algumas considerações. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto) [online] 2012;22(53):423–432. doi: 10.1590/S0103-863X2012000300014. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources