Reduced acquisition times for measurement of myocardial blood flow with 99mTc-tetrofosmin and solid-state detector SPECT
- PMID: 32026329
- DOI: 10.1007/s12350-020-02048-w
Reduced acquisition times for measurement of myocardial blood flow with 99mTc-tetrofosmin and solid-state detector SPECT
Abstract
Background: Measurement of myocardial blood flow (MBF) is feasible using SPECT imaging but the acquisition requires more time than usual. Our study assessed the impact of reducing acquisition times on the accuracy and repeatability of the uptake rate constant (K1).
Methods: Twenty-nine patients underwent two rest/stress studies with Tc-99m-tetrofosmin 18 ± 13 days apart, using a one-day rest/stress dynamic SPECT imaging protocol with a solid-state cardiac camera. A 5-minute static image was acquired prior to tracer injection for subtraction of residual activity, followed immediately by 11-minute of list-mode data collection. Static image acquisition times of 0.5, 1, and 3 minutes and dynamic imaging times of 5, 7, and 9 minutes were simulated by truncating list-mode data. Images were reconstructed with/without attenuation correction and with/without motion correction. Kinetic parameters were calculated using a 1-tissue-compartment model.
Results: K1 increased with reduced dynamic but not static imaging time (P < 0.001). The increase in K1 for a 9-minute scan was small (4.7 ± 5.3%) compared with full-length studies. The repeatability of K1 did not change significantly (13 ± 12%, P > 0.17).
Conclusions: A shortened imaging protocol of 3-minute (rest) or 30-second (stress) static image acquisition and 9 minutes of dynamic image acquisition altered K1 by less than 5% compared to a previously validated 11-minute acquisition.
Keywords: Dynamic SPECT imaging; K1 uptake rate constant; acquisition time; protocol.
© 2020. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
References
-
- Gould KL, Johnson NP, Bateman TM, Beanlands RS, Bengel FM, Bober R, et al. Anatomic versus physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease: Role of coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and positron emission tomography imaging in revascularization decision-making. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:1639–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JACC.2013.07.076 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Schindler TH, Quercioli A, Valenta I, Ambrosio G, Wahl RL, Dilsizian V. Quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow—Clinical and research applications. Semin Nucl Med 2014;44:274–93. https://doi.org/10.1053/J.SEMNUCLMED.2014.04.002 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Murthy VL, Naya M, Foster CR, Hainer J, Gaber M, Di Carli G, et al. Improved cardiac risk assessment with noninvasive measures of coronary flow reserve. Circulation 2011;124:2215–24. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.050427 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Herzog BA, Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, Siegrist PT, Tay FM, et al. Long-term prognostic value of 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography. Added value of coronary flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.069 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bocher M, Blevis IM, Tsukerman L, Shrem Y, Kovalski G, Volokh L. A fast cardiac gamma camera with dynamic SPECT capabilities: Design, system validation and future potential. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010;37:1887–1902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-010-1488-z . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical