Behavioral heterogeneity among cigarette and e-cigarette dual-users and associations with future tobacco use: Findings from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study
- PMID: 32028096
- PMCID: PMC7092617
- DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106263
Behavioral heterogeneity among cigarette and e-cigarette dual-users and associations with future tobacco use: Findings from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study
Abstract
Dual-users of cigarettes and e-cigarettes are commonly treated as a single group. Our study applied a more nuanced classification of this complex behavior to examine its associations with future tobacco use behaviors using data from Waves 1 and 3 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health. Dual-users at Wave 1 (n = 1,665) were categorized into 4 groups based on the frequency with which they used each product (i.e., some days, daily). Analyses identified sociodemographic correlates of group membership and the prevalence of (1) completely switching to e-cigarettes and (2) quitting both products by Wave 3. Dual-users who smoked cigarettes every day and used e-cigarettes some days (69.6%) were the majority and more likely to have lower education (p < .001). Although some day smoking and daily e-cigarette use was the least common category (5.9%), these individuals were most likely to have completely switched to e-cigarettes by Wave 3 (aOR = 6.19, 95% CI = 3.91, 9.79). Dual-users who smoked and used e-cigarettes some days were most likely to have completely quit tobacco by Wave 3 (aOR = 3.98, 95% CI = 2.93, 5.40). In general, dual-users who had higher education or income were more likely to have completely switched to e-cigarettes or quit tobacco use by Wave 3. Adults who concurrently use cigarettes and e-cigarettes exhibit considerable heterogeneity in their use of these tobacco products. Dual-users that are higher on the socioeconomic gradient are more likely to engage in plausibly less harmful dual-use behaviors, which are more strongly associated with harm reduction and cessation behaviors. Future research should consider this variation to more accurately characterize the public health impact of dual-use.
Keywords: Cigarette smoking; Dual-use; Harm reduction; Health disparities; e-cigarette vaping.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
References
-
- Amato Michael S, Boyle Raymond G, and Levy David. “How To Define E-Cigarette Prevalence? Finding Clues in the Use Frequency Distribution”. In: Tobacco Control 25e1 (2015), e24–e29. ISSN: 1468–3318 DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052236 URL: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052236. - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Azagba Sunday, Shan Lingpeng, and Latham Keely. “Adolescent Dual Use Classification and Its Association With Nicotine Dependence and Quit Intentions”. In: Journal of Adolescent Health 652 (2019), pp. 195–201. ISSN: 1054–139X DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.04.009 URL: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.04.009. - DOI - DOI - PubMed
-
- Borland Ron et al. “A New Classification System for Describing Concurrent Use of Nicotine Vaping Products Alongside Cigarettes (so-called “Dual use”): Findings From the Itc-4 Country Smoking and Vaping Wave 1 Survey”. In: Addiction (2019). ISSN: 1360–0443 DOI: 10.1111/add.14570 URL: 10.1111/add.14570. - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Coleman Blair et al. “Transitions in Electronic Cigarette Use Among Adults in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, Waves 1 and 2 (2013–2015).” In: Tobacco control 281 (2019), pp. 50–59. DOI: tobaccocontrol-2017–054174[pii] URL: https://doi.org/tobaccocontrol-2017-054174[pii]. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Coleman Blair N et al. “Electronic Cigarette Use Among Us Adults in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, 2013–2014”. In: Tobacco Control 26e2 (2017), e117–e126. ISSN: 1468–3318 DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053462 URL: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053462. - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical