Virtual Simulation in Nursing Education: A Systematic Review Spanning 1996 to 2018
- PMID: 32028447
- DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000411
Virtual Simulation in Nursing Education: A Systematic Review Spanning 1996 to 2018
Abstract
As virtual simulation is burgeoning, faculty and administrators are asking for evidence of its effectiveness. The objective of this systematic review was to identify how virtual simulation impacts nursing student learning outcomes. Applying the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, 80 studies were reviewed. Results indicate that most research (n = 69, 86%) supported virtual simulation as an effective pedagogy to support learning outcomes while highlighting gaps and areas of bias. Adding search terms could have expanded the findings. The body of evidence supports virtual simulation as an effective pedagogy. Future studies should use more robust research designs, prioritize curricular integration of virtual simulation, and determine best practices in virtual simulation methodology.
References
-
- Leflore JL, Anderson M, Zielke MA, et al. Can a virtual patient trainer teach student nurses how to save lives—teaching nursing students about pediatric respiratory diseases. Simul Healthc 2012;7(1):10–17.
-
- Cant R, Cooper S, Sussex R, Bogossian F. What's in a name? Clarifying the nomenclature of virtual simulation. Clin Simul Nurs 2019;27:26–30.
-
- Lopreiato JO. Heathcare Simulation Dictionary. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2016:1–48.
-
- Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP checklist. Updated 2017. Available at: https://casp-uk.net/. Accessed December 11, 2017.
-
- Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6(7):e1000097.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials