Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Feb 5;10(2):e033228.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033228.

Benefits and harms of high-dose haemodiafiltration versus high-flux haemodialysis: the comparison of high-dose haemodiafiltration with high-flux haemodialysis (CONVINCE) trial protocol

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Benefits and harms of high-dose haemodiafiltration versus high-flux haemodialysis: the comparison of high-dose haemodiafiltration with high-flux haemodialysis (CONVINCE) trial protocol

Peter J Blankestijn et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is a major public health problem affecting more than 2 million people worldwide. It is one of the most severe chronic non-communicable diseases. Haemodialysis (HD) is the most common therapeutic option but is also associated with a risk of cardiovascular events, hospitalisation and suboptimal quality of life. Over the past decades, haemodiafiltration (HDF) has become available. Although high-dose HDF has shown some promising survival advantage compared to conventional HD, the evidence remains controversial. A Cochrane systematic review found, in low-quality trials, with various convective forms of dialysis, a reduction in cardiovascular, but not all-cause mortality and the effects on non-fatal cardiovascular events and hospitalisation were uncertain. In contrast, an individual patient data analysis suggested that high-dose HDF reduced both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared to HD. In view of these discrepant results, a definitive trial is required to determine whether high-dose HDF is preferable to high-flux HD. The comparison of high-dose HDF with high-flux HD (CONVINCE) study will assess the benefits and harms of high-dose HDF versus a conventional high-flux HD in adults with ESKD.

Methods and analysis: This international, prospective, open label, randomised controlled trial aims to recruit 1800 ESKD adults treated with HD in nine European countries. Patients will be randomised 1:1 to high-dose HDF versus continuation of conventional high-flux HD. The primary outcome will be all-cause mortality at 3 years' follow-up. Secondary outcomes will include cause-specific mortality, cardiovascular events, all-cause and infection-related hospitalisations, patient-reported outcomes (eg, health-related quality of life) and cost-effectiveness.

Ethics and dissemination: The CONVINCE study will address the question of benefits and harms of high-dose HDF compared to high-flux HD for kidney replacement therapy in patients with ESKD with a focus on survival, patient perspectives and cost-effectiveness.

Trial registration number: Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR 7138).

Keywords: end-stage kidney disease; haemodiafiltration; haemodialysis; protocol; randomised controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

References

    1. National Kidney Foundation . Global facts: about kidney disease. Available: https://www.kidney.org/kidneydisease/global-facts-about-kidney-disease [Accessed 19 Feb 2019].
    1. Fresenius Medical Care . Outlook. Available: https://www.freseniusmedicalcare.com/en/investors/at-a-glance/outlook/ [Accessed 19 Feb 2019].
    1. Steenkamp R, Rao A, Fraser S. UK renal registry 18th annual report (December 2015) chapter 5: survival and causes of death in UK adult patients on renal replacement therapy in 2014: national and Centre-specific analyses. Nephron 2016;132(Suppl 1):111–44. 10.1159/000444819 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nordio M, Limido A, Maggiore U, et al. . Survival in patients treated by long-term dialysis compared with the general population. Am J Kidney Dis 2012;59:819–28. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.12.023 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Naylor KL, Kim SJ, McArthur E, et al. . Mortality in incident maintenance dialysis patients versus incident solid organ cancer patients: a population-based cohort. Am J Kidney Dis 2019;73:765–76. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.12.011 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types