Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May;29(5):409-417.
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010060. Epub 2020 Feb 6.

De-implementing wisely: developing the evidence base to reduce low-value care

Affiliations

De-implementing wisely: developing the evidence base to reduce low-value care

Jeremy M Grimshaw et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 May.

Abstract

Choosing Wisely (CW) campaigns globally have focused attention on the need to reduce low-value care, which can represent up to 30% of the costs of healthcare. Despite early enthusiasm for the CW initiative, few large-scale changes in rates of low-value care have been reported since the launch of these campaigns. Recent commentaries suggest that the focus of the campaign should be on implementation of evidence-based strategies to effectively reduce low-value care. This paper describes the Choosing Wisely De-Implementation Framework (CWDIF), a novel framework that builds on previous work in the field of implementation science and proposes a comprehensive approach to systematically reduce low-value care in both hospital and community settings and advance the science of de-implementation.The CWDIF consists of five phases: Phase 0, identification of potential areas of low-value healthcare; Phase 1, identification of local priorities for implementation of CW recommendations; Phase 2, identification of barriers to implementing CW recommendations and potential interventions to overcome these; Phase 3, rigorous evaluations of CW implementation programmes; Phase 4, spread of effective CW implementation programmes. We provide a worked example of applying the CWDIF to develop and evaluate an implementation programme to reduce unnecessary preoperative testing in healthy patients undergoing low-risk surgeries and to further develop the evidence base to reduce low-value care.

Keywords: evaluation methodology; health services research; healthcare quality improvement; implementation science; patient-centred care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: EK serves as a clinical consultant for BIND Benefits Inc.; JMG holds a CIHR Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Transfer and Uptake and has a CIHR Foundation Grant (FDN-143269); WL is Chair of Choosing Wisely Canada.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Choosing Wisely De-Implementation Framework with preoperative testing example.

References

    1. Brownlee S, Chalkidou K, Doust J, et al. . Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world. The Lancet 2017;390:156–68. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32585-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kirkham KR, Wijeysundera DN, Pendrith C, et al. . Preoperative testing before low-risk surgical procedures. Can Med Assoc J 2015;187:E349–58. 10.1503/cmaj.150174 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Canadian Institute for Health Information CIHI. unnecessary care in Canada: technical report. Ottawa, ON: CIHI, 2017.
    1. Institute of Medicine (IOM) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Acadeemy Press, 2001. - PubMed
    1. Mangione-Smith R, DeCristofaro AH, Setodji CM, et al. . The quality of ambulatory care delivered to children in the United States. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1515–23. 10.1056/NEJMsa064637 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms