Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 11;17(2):873-888.
doi: 10.1007/s40201-019-00405-7. eCollection 2019 Dec.

Modeling and optimizing parameters affecting hexavalent chromium adsorption from aqueous solutions using Ti-XAD7 nanocomposite: RSM-CCD approach, kinetic, and isotherm studies

Affiliations

Modeling and optimizing parameters affecting hexavalent chromium adsorption from aqueous solutions using Ti-XAD7 nanocomposite: RSM-CCD approach, kinetic, and isotherm studies

Sahar Sharifi et al. J Environ Health Sci Eng. .

Abstract

Background: Due to the high toxicity of chromium, particularly as Hexavalent chromium Cr (VI), it is removed from industrial effluents before their discharge into the environment by a variety of methods, including loading catalysts onto the polymeric supports. This study focused on the removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions using Amberlite XAD7 resin loaded titanium dioxide (Ti-XAD7).

Methods: Ti-XAD7 was synthesized using Amberlite XAD-7 impregnated with titanium tetraethoxide. The prepared Ti-XAD7 was characterized by using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). Isotherms and kinetic studies were carried out to describe the adsorption behavior of adsorbent for the removal of Cr(VI) ions. Quadratic models considering independent variables, i.e. the initial Cr(VI) concentration, adsorbent dosage, time, and pH, were evaluated and optimized to describe the behavior of Cr(VI) adsorption onto the Ti-XAD7 using RSM based on a Five-level-four-factor CCD approach.

Results: The accuracy and the fitting of the model were evaluated by ANOVA with R2 > 0.725 and P value = 5.221 × 10-5. The optimum conditions for the adsorption process were an initial Cr(VI) concentration 2750 ppb, contact time of 51.53 min, pH of 8.7, and Ti-XAD7 dosage of 5.05 g/L. The results revealed that the Langmuir and Sips isotherm models with R2 = 0.998 and 0.999 were the best models fitting the experimental data. The adsorption capacity of Ti-XAD7 and RL constant were 2.73 mg/g and 0.063-0.076 based on the Langmuir isotherm, respectively. Kinetic studies also indicated that the adsorption behavior of Cr(VI) was acceptably explained by the Elovich kinetic model with a good fitting (R2 = 0.97).

Conclusions: Comparison of the Ti-XAD7 and XAD7 yield in chromium adsorption showed that modified XAD7 had higher removal efficiency (about 98%) compared to XAD7 alone.

Keywords: Cr(VI) adsorption; Isotherm and kinetic study; Process optimization; RSM statistical modeling; Ti-XAD7.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors of this article declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Box plot of Cr (VI) removal efficiency by XAD7 and Ti-XAD7
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
SEM image of (a) Amberlite XAD7 and (b) Ti-XAD7, (c) FTIR images of Amberlite XAD7 and Ti-XAD7 and (d) XRD image Ti-XAD7
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Contour plots used to display the effects of, a: pH and adsorbent dose, b: time and pH, c: adsorbent dose and concentration, and d: time and adsorbent dose, for Ti-XAD7
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Non-linear plot of two-parameter isotherm models fitted to the experimental data (T = 293 K, pH = 8.7, Ti-XAD7 dosage = 5.05 g/L, time = 120 min)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Non-linear plot of three-parameter isotherm models fitted to the experimental data (T = 293 K, pH = 8.7, Ti-XAD7 dosage = 5.05 g/L, time = 120 min)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Plot of adsorption kinetic equations for sorption of Cr(VI) onto Ti-XAD7 (T = 293 k, pH = 8.7, dosage = 5.05 g/L)

References

    1. Kan C-C, Ibe AH, Rivera KKP, Arazo RO, de Luna MDG. Hexavalent chromium removal from aqueous solution by adsorbents synthesized from groundwater treatment residuals. Sustain Environ Res. 2017;27(4):163–171. doi: 10.1016/j.serj.2017.04.001. - DOI
    1. Albadarin AB, Mangwandi C, Ala’a H, Walker GM, Allen SJ, Ahmad MNM. Kinetic and thermodynamics of chromium ions adsorption onto low-cost dolomite adsorbent. Chem Eng J. 2012;179:193–202. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.10.080. - DOI
    1. Pandikumar A, Ramaraj R. Photocatalytic reduction of hexavalent chromium at gold nanoparticles modified titania nanotubes. Mater Chem Phys. 2013;141(2–3):629–635. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.05.026. - DOI
    1. Dwivedi AD, Permana R, Singh JP, Yoon H, Chae KH, Chang Y-S, et al. Tunichrome mimetic matrix, its perspective in abatement for carcinogenic hexavalent chromium and specific coordination behavior. Chem Eng J. 2017;328:629–638. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.078. - DOI
    1. Wu Y, Song S, Garbers-Craig AM, Xue Z. Formation and leachability of hexavalent chromium in the Al2O3-CaO-MgO-Cr2O3 system. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2018;38(6):2649–2661. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.01.012. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources