Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec;11(12):5328-5335.
doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.11.69.

The benefits of digital drainage system versus traditional drainage system after robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy

Kristina Jacobsen  1 , Steven Talbert  2 , Joseph H Boyer  3
Affiliations

The benefits of digital drainage system versus traditional drainage system after robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy

Kristina Jacobsen et al. J Thorac Dis. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Postoperative air leaks are the most common complication after a pulmonary resection. There is no data in the literature comparing the traditional and digital chest drainage system after a robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy.

Methods: This was a retrospective, correlational study. Medical records from 182 eligible robotic-assisted lobectomy patients were evaluated to determine the association between digital and traditional chest tube drainage systems (CTDS) with postoperative chest tube days, hospital LOS, chest tube reinsertion during hospitalization, and 30-day readmission for pneumothorax. Multiple regression was used to determine the association between CTDS while controlling for confounding variables.

Results: No differences were noted between groups for age, gender, BMI, smoking, adhesions or neoadjuvant therapy. Patients with digital drainage systems had significantly shorter chest tube duration than those with traditional drainage systems (2.07 vs. 2.73 days, P=0.003). After controlling for age and BMI, CTDS was not found to be a significant predictor of CT duration. Digital drainage system were also associated with significantly shorter hospital LOS (4.02 vs. 5.06 days, P=0.01) After controlling for age, BMI, and presence of post-op a-fib, use of a digital CTDS was significantly associated with 1 day shorter hospital LOS. Chest tube reinsertion occurred four times more frequently with traditional drainage systems, but the difference did not achieve the level of statistical significance (P=0.059). The frequency of readmission due to pneumothorax was very low (1 patient per group), which prevented comparative statistical analysis.

Conclusions: In the digital drainage system there are shorter chest tube days and hospital length of stay after a robotic-assisted lobectomy. The decision to remove chest tubes in the traditional drainage system is burdened with uncertainty. The digital drainage system reduces intraobserver variability allowing for improved decision making in chest tube removal. Both CT duration and hospital LOS were shorter using unadjusted analyses. Type of CTDS was not significantly associated with CT duration after controlling for age and BMI. However, after controlling for age, BMI, and post-op atrial fibrillation, use of the digital CTDS was associated with a 1 day reduction in hospital LOS.

Keywords: Digital drainage system; air leak; lobectomy; robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean chest tube days in the traditional and digital chest drainage systems.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean hospital length of stay in the traditional and digital chest drainage systems.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Miller DL, Helms G, Mayfield W. Digital drainage system reduces hospitalization after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lung resection. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;102:955-61. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.03.089 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mueller MR, Marzluf B. The anticipation and management of air leaks and residual spaces post lung resection. J Thorac Dis 2014;6:271-84. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cerfolio RJ, Bass C, Pask A, et al. Predictors and treatment of persistent air leaks. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:1727-30. 10.1016/S0003-4975(02)03531-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant A. The benefits of continuous and digital air leak assessment after elective pulmonary resection: a prospective study. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:396-401. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.04.016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baringer K, Talbert S. Chest drainage systems and management of air leaks after a pulmonary resection. J Thorac Dis 2017;9:5399-403. 10.21037/jtd.2017.11.15 - DOI - PMC - PubMed