Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb;94(2):357-369.
doi: 10.1007/s00204-020-02655-z. Epub 2020 Feb 6.

Safety of tattoos and permanent make-up: a regulatory view

Affiliations
Review

Safety of tattoos and permanent make-up: a regulatory view

Michael Giulbudagian et al. Arch Toxicol. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

The continuous increase in the popularity of tattoos and permanent make-up (PMU) has led to substantial changes in their societal perception. Besides a better understanding of pathological conditions associated with the injection of highly diverse substances into subepidermal layers of the skin, their regulation has occupied regulatory bodies around the globe. In that sense, current regulatory progress in the European Union is an exemplary initiative for improving the safety of tattooing. On one hand, the compilation of market surveillance data has provided knowledge on hazardous substances present in tattoo inks. On the other hand, clinical data gathered from patients enabled correlation of adverse reactions with certain substances. Nevertheless, the assessment of risks remains a challenge due to knowledge gaps on the biokinetics of highly complex inks and their degradation products. This review article examines the strategies for regulating substances in tattoo inks and PMU in light of their potential future restriction in the frame of the REACH regulation. Substance categories are discussed in terms of their risk assessment and proposed concentration limits.

Keywords: Ink; Permanent make-up; Pigments; REACH; Tattoos.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arbache S, Mattos EDC, Diniz MF et al (2019) How much medication is delivered in a novel drug delivery technique that uses a tattoo machine? Int J Dermatol 58(6):750–755. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.14408 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baranska A, Shawket A, Jouve M et al (2018) Unveiling skin macrophage dynamics explains both tattoo persistence and strenuous removal. J Exp Med 215(4):1115–1133. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20171608 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Bäumler W (2016) Tattoos and their potential health consequences. Dtsch Arztebl Int 113(40):663–664. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2016.0663 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. BfR (2012) Requirements for tattoo inks. BfR opinion No 013/2013. https://mobil.bfr.bund.de/cm/349/requirements-for-tattoo-inks.pdf
    1. BfR (2018) BfR-Verbrauchermonitor 2018, Spezial Tattoos. https://www.bfr.bund.de/cm/350/bfr-verbrauchermonitor-2018-spezial-tatto...

LinkOut - more resources