Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;37(1):55-65.
doi: 10.1007/s11282-020-00425-2. Epub 2020 Feb 6.

Odontogenic keratocyst and ameloblastoma: radiographic evaluation

Affiliations

Odontogenic keratocyst and ameloblastoma: radiographic evaluation

Jira Kitisubkanchana et al. Oral Radiol. 2021 Jan.

Erratum in

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the radiographic features of odontogenic keratocysts (OKCs) and ameloblastomas and to compare the radiographic findings between these 2 lesions.

Methods: Radiographs of OKCs and ameloblastomas were retrospectively reviewed. Location, border, shape, association with impacted tooth, tooth displacement, root resorption, and bone expansion were evaluated. Chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests were used for statistical analysis. A p value < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results: One hundred OKCs and 101 ameloblastomas were reviewed. The ratios of maxilla to mandible were 1:1.4 and 1:9.1 in OKCs and ameloblastomas, respectively. All evaluated features significantly differed between OKCs and ameloblastomas (p ≤ 0.001). Most OKCs showed smooth border (60%) and unilocular shape (82%), while most ameloblastomas showed scalloped border (77.2%) and multilocular shape (68.3%). Association with impacted tooth was found in 47% of OKCs and 18.8% of ameloblastomas. Adjacent tooth displacement was found in 33.7% of OKCs and 55.8% of ameloblastomas. Root resorption was more common in ameloblastomas (66.7%) than in OKCs (7%). Bone expansion was also more common in ameloblastomas (96.3%) than in OKCs (63.6%).

Conclusion: A unilocular radiolucent lesion with smooth border, no adjacent tooth displacement, no root resorption and causing mild or no bone expansion is suggestive of an OKC rather than an ameloblastoma.

Keywords: Ameloblastoma; Differential diagnosis; Odontogenic keratocyst.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Philipsen HP. Keratocystic odontogenic tumour. In: Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, Sidransky D, editors. World Health Organization classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics: head and neck tumours. Lyon: IARC Press; 2005. p. 306–307.
    1. El-Naggar AK, Chan John KC, Grandis JR, Takata T, Slootweg PJ. World Health Organization classification of head and neck tumours. Lyon: IARC Press; 2017.
    1. Manor E, Kachko L, Puterman MB, Szabo G, Bodner L. Cystic lesions of the jaws—a clinicopathological study of 322 cases and review of the literature. Int J Med Sci. 2012;99(1):20–6. - DOI
    1. Tamiolakis P, Thermos G, Tosios KI, Sklavounou-Andrikopoulou A. Demographic and clinical characteristics of 5294 jaw cysts: a retrospective study of 38 years. Head Neck Pathol. 2019;13(4):587–96. - DOI
    1. Reichart PA, Philipsen HP, Sonner S. Ameloblastoma: biological profile of 3677 cases. Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol. 1995;31B(2):86–99. - DOI

MeSH terms