Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2020 Apr 1;38(10):1041-1049.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02044. Epub 2020 Feb 7.

EV-101: A Phase I Study of Single-Agent Enfortumab Vedotin in Patients With Nectin-4-Positive Solid Tumors, Including Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

EV-101: A Phase I Study of Single-Agent Enfortumab Vedotin in Patients With Nectin-4-Positive Solid Tumors, Including Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

Jonathan Rosenberg et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Erratum in

  • Erratum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] J Clin Oncol. 2022 May 20;40(15):1711. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00785. J Clin Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35580363 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the safety/tolerability and antitumor activity of enfortumab vedotin (EV), a novel investigational antibody-drug conjugate that delivers the microtubule-disrupting agent, monomethyl auristatin E, to cells that express Nectin-4.

Methods: EV-101 is a phase I dose escalation/expansion study that enrolled patients with Nectin-4-expressing solid tumors (eg, metastatic urothelial carcinoma [mUC]) who progressed on ≥ 1 prior chemotherapy regimen and/or programmed death-1 receptor/programmed death ligand-1 [PD-(L)1] inhibitor, including a cohort of patients with mUC who received prior anti-PD-(L)1 therapy. Patients received escalating doses of EV up to 1.25 mg/kg on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle. Primary objectives were evaluation of safety/tolerability and pharmacokinetics; antitumor activity was a secondary objective.

Results: Enrolled patients with mUC (n = 155) were heavily pretreated, with 96% having prior platinum-based chemotherapy and 29% receiving ≥ 3 lines of prior treatment. Maximum tolerated dose of EV was not established; however, the recommended phase II dose was identified as 1.25 mg/kg. Rash, peripheral neuropathy, fatigue, alopecia, and nausea were the most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); the most common TRAEs were grade 1-2 in severity. Among the 112 patients with mUC treated with single-agent EV 1.25 mg/kg, the investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was 43%, and duration of response was 7.4 months. Median overall survival (OS) was 12.3 months, and the OS rate at 1 year was 51.8%. Similar ORR and estimated median OS were observed in patients ≥ 75 years of age with and without prior anti-PD-(L)1 treatment, liver metastases, or upper-tract disease.

Conclusion: Single-agent EV was generally well tolerated and provided clinically meaningful and durable responses in patients with mUC; survival data are encouraging. A pivotal phase II and a confirmatory phase III study are ongoing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Antitumor effects of enfortumab vedotin 1.25 mg/kg in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. (A) Change in tumor burden from baseline (investigator assessed). A total of 103 patients had at least 1 measurable postbaseline response assessment. (B) Time to response and duration of response (DoR; investigator-assessed responders only). (C) DoR (investigator assessed). (D) Progression-free survival (investigator assessed). (E) Overall survival (OS; investigator assessed). (*) Patients with liver metastasis at baseline. CR, complete response; PD-(L)1, programmed death-1 receptor/programmed death ligand-1; PR, partial response.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Survival with enfortumab vedotin (EV) 1.25 mg/kg in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) with prior programmed death-1 receptor/programmed death ligand-1 [PD-(L)1] exposure. (A) Duration of response (investigator-assessed responders and central review). (B) Progression-free survival (PFS; central review). (C) Overall survival (OS; investigator assessed).

References

    1. Samanta D, Almo SC. Nectin family of cell-adhesion molecules: Structural and molecular aspects of function and specificity. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015;72:645–658. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Challita-Eid PM, Satpayev D, Yang P, et al. Enfortumab vedotin antibody-drug conjugate targeting Nectin-4 is a highly potent therapeutic agent in multiple preclinical cancer models. Cancer Res. 2016;76:3003–3013. - PubMed
    1. Rikitake Y, Mandai K, Takai Y. The role of nectins in different types of cell-cell adhesion. J Cell Sci. 2012;125:3713–3722. - PubMed
    1. Uhlén M, Fagerberg L, Hallström BM, et al. Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science. 2015;347:1260419. - PubMed
    1. Wu C, Orozco C, Boyer J, et al. BioGPS: An extensible and customizable portal for querying and organizing gene annotation resources. Genome Biol. 2009;10:R130. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types