Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Apr 1;86(8):e02765-19.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.02765-19. Print 2020 Apr 1.

Emergence of Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli among Australian Chickens in the Absence of Fluoroquinolone Use

Affiliations

Emergence of Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli among Australian Chickens in the Absence of Fluoroquinolone Use

Sam Abraham et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. .

Abstract

In a structured survey of all major chicken-meat producers in Australia, we investigated the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and genomic characteristics of Campylobacter jejuni (n = 108) and C. coli (n = 96) from cecal samples of chickens at slaughter (n = 200). The majority of the C. jejuni (63%) and C. coli (86.5%) samples were susceptible to all antimicrobials. Fluoroquinolone resistance was detected among both C. jejuni (14.8%) and C. coli (5.2%), although this only included three sequence types (STs) and one ST, respectively. Multidrug resistance among strains of C. jejuni (0.9%) and C. coli (4.1%) was rare, and fluoroquinolone resistance, when present, was never accompanied by resistance to any other agent. Comparative genome analysis demonstrated that Australian isolates were found dispersed on different branches/clusters within the international collection. The major fluoroquinolone-resistant STs of C. jejuni (ST7323, ST2083, and ST2343) and C. coli (ST860) present in Australian chickens were similar to those of international isolates and have been reported previously in humans and animals overseas. The detection of a subpopulation of Campylobacter isolates exclusively resistant to fluoroquinolone was unexpected since most critically important antimicrobials such as fluoroquinolones are excluded from use in Australian livestock. A number of factors, including the low level of resistance to other antimicrobials, the absence of fluoroquinolone use, the adoption of measures for preventing spread of contagion between flocks, and particularly the genomic identities of isolates, all point to humans, pest species, or wild birds as being the most plausible source of organisms. This study also demonstrates the need for vigilance in the form of surveillance for AMR based on robust sampling to manage AMR risks in the food chain.IMPORTANCECampylobacter is one of the most common causes of gastroenteritis in humans, with infections frequently resulting from exposure to undercooked poultry products. Although human illness is typically self-limiting, a minority of cases do require antimicrobial therapy. Ensuring that Campylobacter originating from meat chickens does not acquire resistance to fluoroquinolones is therefore a valuable outcome for public health. Australia has never legalized the use of fluoroquinolones in commercial chickens and until now fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter has not been detected in the Australian poultry. This structured survey of meat chickens derived from all major Australian producers describes the unexpected emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli Genetic characterization suggests that these isolates may have evolved outside the Australian poultry sector and were introduced into poultry by humans, pest species, or wild birds. The findings dramatically underline the critical role of biosecurity in the overall fight against antimicrobial resistance.

Keywords: AMR; Australia; Campylobacter; Campylobacter coli; Campylobacter jejuni; antimicrobial resistance; chicken; fluoroquinolone; genome analysis; livestock.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Antimicrobial resistance patterns for C. jejuni (n = 108) isolated from Australian meat chickens. The proportion susceptible is shown in blue, and the proportion resistant is shown in red.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Antimicrobial resistance patterns for C. coli (n = 96) isolated from Australian meat chickens. The proportion susceptible is shown in blue, and the proportion resistant is shown in red.
FIG 3
FIG 3
Core genome phylogeny of the 105 Australian (blue) and 628 international collection (red) isolates of C. jejuni. The Australian isolates are dispersed on different branches, along with the international collection. The presence of two resistance genes (tet and blaOXA) found among isolates are indicated as black squares. Moreover, the Australian ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates (ST2083 shown as purple squares) are found on the same node with a similar strain type from the international collection.
FIG 4
FIG 4
Core genome phylogeny of the 82 Australian (blue) and 647 international collection (red) isolates of C. coli. The Australian isolates are found dispersed on different branches, along with the international collection. The presence of two resistance genes (tet and blaOXA) found among isolates are indicated as black squares. Moreover, the Australian ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates (ST860 shown as purple squares) are found on the same node with a similar strain type from the international collection.

References

    1. Wagenaar JA, French NP, Havelaar AH. 2013. Preventing Campylobacter at the source: why is it so difficult? Clin Infect Dis 57:1600–1606. doi:10.1093/cid/cit555. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Luangtongkum T, Jeon B, Han J, Plummer P, Logue CM, Zhang Q. 2009. Antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter: emergence, transmission, and persistence. Future Microbiol 4:189–200. doi:10.2217/17460913.4.2.189. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ruiz-Palacios GM. 2007. The health burden of Campylobacter infection and the impact of antimicrobial resistance: playing chicken. Clin Infect Dis 44:701–703. doi:10.1086/509936. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Silva J, Leite D, Fernandes M, Mena C, Gibbs PA, Teixeira P. 2011. Campylobacter spp. as a foodborne pathogen: a review. Front Microbiol 2:200. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2011.00200. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Müllner P, Collins-Emerson JM, Midwinter AC, Carter P, Spencer SE, van der Logt P, Hathaway S, French NP. 2010. Molecular epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni in a geographically isolated country with a uniquely structured poultry industry. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:2145–2154. doi:10.1128/AEM.00862-09. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources