Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Feb 7;223(Pt Suppl 1):jeb218198.
doi: 10.1242/jeb.218198.

How to turn an organism into a model organism in 10 'easy' steps

Affiliations
Review

How to turn an organism into a model organism in 10 'easy' steps

Benjamin J Matthews et al. J Exp Biol. .

Abstract

Many of the major biological discoveries of the 20th century were made using just six species: Escherichia coli bacteria, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe yeast, Caenorhabditis elegans nematodes, Drosophila melanogaster flies and Mus musculus mice. Our molecular understanding of the cell division cycle, embryonic development, biological clocks and metabolism were all obtained through genetic analysis using these species. Yet the 'big 6' did not start out as genetic model organisms (hereafter 'model organisms'), so how did they mature into such powerful systems? First, these model organisms are abundant human commensals: they are the bacteria in our gut, the yeast in our beer and bread, the nematodes in our compost pile, the flies in our kitchen and the mice in our walls. Because of this, they are cheaply, easily and rapidly bred in the laboratory and in addition were amenable to genetic analysis. How and why should we add additional species to this roster? We argue that specialist species will reveal new secrets in important areas of biology and that with modern technological innovations like next-generation sequencing and CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing, the time is ripe to move beyond the big 6. In this review, we chart a 10-step path to this goal, using our own experience with the Aedes aegypti mosquito, which we built into a model organism for neurobiology in one decade. Insights into the biology of this deadly disease vector require that we work with the mosquito itself rather than modeling its biology in another species.

Keywords: Behavior; CRISPR-Cas9; Genetics; Genome; Mosquito; Transgenesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare no competing or financial interests.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Genomes, transcriptomes and gene annotations. (A) Comparative size of three insect genomes. (B) Methods for genome sequencing, assembly and annotation. (C) Schematic diagram of tissues used for bulk tissue RNA sequencing for the Aedes aegypti neurotranscriptome (Matthews et al., 2016). (D) Tissue-specific expression of chemosensory receptors as annotated in the updated genome (Matthews et al., 2018). TPM, transcripts per million. Photo credit: André Karwath (fly) and Alex Wild (mosquitoes).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Genome editing for cell type-specific labeling. (A) A female Ae. aegypti simultaneously contacting water with her foreleg and laying an egg on a substrate near the water line. Photo credit: Alex Wild. (B) Schematic diagram of a CRISPR-Cas9-generated knock-in/knock-out in which the ppk301 gene is disrupted by the insertion of the QF2 transcription factor. (C) Schematic diagram of a CRISPR-Cas9-generated gene-sparing knock-in in which a T2A ‘ribosomal skipping’ peptide facilitates expression of both the endogenous gene and the QF2 transcription factor. (D) Schematic diagram of the Q system. (E) Image of the 5th tarsomere of the front legs of animals of the indicated genotype expressing dTomato in ppk301-expressing cells. (F) Demonstration of the utility of the T2 ribosome-skipping peptide by co-expression of both dTomato and GCaMP6s in a single ppk301-expressing cell. Figure adapted from Matthews et al. (2019).

References

    1. Adams M. D., Celniker S. E., Holt R. A., Evans C. A., Gocayne J. D., Amanatides P. G., Scherer S. E., Li P. W., Hoskins R. A., Galle R. F. et al. (2000). The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 287, 2185-2195. 10.1126/science.287.5461.2185 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akbari O. S., Antoshechkin I., Amrhein H., Williams B., Diloreto R., Sandler J. and Hay B. A. (2013). The developmental transcriptome of the mosquito Aedes aegypti, an invasive species and major arbovirus vector. G3 (Bethesda) 3, 1493-1509. 10.1534/g3.113.006742 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ando T. and Fujiwara H. (2013). Electroporation-mediated somatic transgenesis for rapid functional analysis in insects. Development 140, 454-458. 10.1242/dev.085241 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arensburger P., Megy K., Waterhouse R. M., Abrudan J., Amedeo P., Antelo B., Bartholomay L., Bidwell S., Caler E., Camara F. et al. (2010). Sequencing of Culex quinquefasciatus establishes a platform for mosquito comparative genomics. Science 330, 86-88. 10.1126/science.1191864 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aryan A., Anderson M. A. E., Myles K. M. and Adelman Z. N. (2013). TALEN-based gene disruption in the dengue vector Aedes aegypti. PLoS ONE 8, e60082 10.1371/journal.pone.0060082 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources