Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;33(8):808-814.
doi: 10.1038/s41443-020-0238-4. Epub 2020 Feb 7.

Suprapubic pedicled phalloplasty in transgender men: a multicentric retrospective cohort analysis

Affiliations

Suprapubic pedicled phalloplasty in transgender men: a multicentric retrospective cohort analysis

Marco Falcone et al. Int J Impot Res. 2020 Dec.

Erratum in

Abstract

A variety of approaches are available to address a genital gender affirming surgery (GGAS) in transgender men. The aim of the present study is to report surgical and functional outcomes after a suprapubic pedicled phalloplasty (SPP). From November 2008 to August 2018, a consecutive series of 34 patients underwent an SPP in two tertiary referral centers. GGAS was conducted as a multistaged procedure, consisting (1) SPP with subsequent radial artery-based forearm free-flap urethroplasty, (2) glans sculpting, urethral anastomosis, and scrotoplasty, and (3) penile prosthesis implantation. The duration of surgery, intra and postoperative complications, and hospital stay were selected as variables for surgical outcomes. Functional outcomes were extrapolated from a four-item questionnaire.A partial necrosis of phallus was detected in two cases (5.8 %). Two cases of seroma formation with wound dehiscence (5.8%) were detected. Overall, 89% of patients declared to be fully satisfied of the SPP, 83% would recommend the procedure to someone else, and 89% would undergo the same procedure again. Overall, 66% of patients could achieve an orgasm during sexual penetrative intercourses. The retrospective design, the lack of randomization and validated questionnaire for outcomes reporting, and the limited follow-up represent the main drawbacks of our study. Our evidences suggest that SPP represents as an acceptable option for GGAS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Hage JJ, Bloem JJ, Suliman HM. Review of the literature on techniques for phalloplasty with emphasis on the applicability in female-to-male transsexuals. J Urol. 1993;150:1093–8. - DOI
    1. Bettocchi C, Ralph DJ, Pryor JP. Pedicled pubic phalloplasty in females with gender dysphoria. BJU Int. 2005;95:120–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05262.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Terrier J-É, Courtois F, Ruffion A, Morel Journel N. Surgical outcomes and patients’ satisfaction with suprapubic phalloplasty. J Sex Med. 2014;11:288–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12297. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Selvaggi G, Dhejne C, Landen M, Elander A. The 2011 WPATH standards of care and penile reconstruction in female-to-male transsexual individuals. Adv Urol. 2012;2012:581712. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/581712. - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Garaffa G, Ralph DJ, Christopher N. Total urethral construction with the radial artery-based forearm free flap in the transsexual. BJU Int. 2010;106:1206–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09247.x - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources