Functional and perioperative outcomes in elderly men after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
- PMID: 32034499
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03096-0
Functional and perioperative outcomes in elderly men after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to compare postoperative functional outcomes following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in elderly men with localized prostate cancer.
Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of men who underwent RARP between January 2007 and November 2018 was performed. Patients over 65 years of age were selected (N = 302) and then stratified by age group: 66-69 years old (N = 214) and ≥ 70 years old (N = 88). Full continence was defined as strict 0-pad per day usage. Preoperative potency included those with a Sexual Health Inventory for Men score ≥ 17. Preoperative and postoperative functional outcomes were assessed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate time to recovery of continence in both groups.
Results: Both groups had comparable preoperative parameters. Continence rates at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months in the 66-69-year-old group were 6%, 34%, 61%, 70%, 74%, 80% and 87%, respectively. Comparatively in the ≥ 70-year-old group, continence rates were significantly lower at all time points (3%, 22%, 50%, 56%, 66%, 69% and 75%, respectively). Men in the 66-69-year-old group were significantly more likely to be continent after RARP when compared to patients 70 years of age and above [(Hazards ratio (HR) 0.73; 95%confidence interval 0.54-0.97, (p = 0.035)].
Conclusion: Our results suggest that RARP is feasible in elderly patients. Nevertheless, elderly patients in the ≥ 70-year-old group had significantly inferior postoperative continence rates compared to patients aged 66-69 years. Such information is valuable when counselling men during preoperative RARP planning to ensure that they have realistic postoperative expectations.
Keywords: Continence; Outcomes; Potency; Prostate cancer; Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
References
-
- Morgan TM, Kaffenberger SD, Cookson MS (2012) Surgical and chemotherapeutic management of regional lymph nodes in bladder cancer. J Urol 188(4):1081–1088 - DOI
-
- Greco KA et al (2009) Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men aged %3e or =70 years. BJU Int 104(10):1492–1495 - DOI
-
- Buscarini M, Josephson DY, Stein JP (2007) Lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer: a review. Urol Int 79(3):191–199 - DOI
-
- Huang GJ, Sadetsky N, Penson DF (2010) Health related quality of life for men treated for localized prostate cancer with long-term followup. J Urol 183(6):2206–2212 - DOI
-
- Ficarra V et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):405–417 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
