Bioresorbable scaffold: Never say never
- PMID: 32034869
- DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28751
Bioresorbable scaffold: Never say never
Abstract
Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVSs) were designed to overcome the limitations of metallic stents. Absorb BVS has provided information about strut thickness, scaffold degradation, vessel wall coverage, and their influence on thrombosis. Clinical trials have shown higher rates of target vessel myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis with the absorb BVS than with second-generation drug-eluting stents.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Comment on
-
Three to four years outcomes of the absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus second-generation drug-eluting stent: A meta-analysis.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb;95(2):216-223. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28290. Epub 2019 Apr 19. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020. PMID: 31002216
References
REFERENCES
-
- Kawamoto H, Jabbour RJ, Tanaka A, Latib A, Colombo A. The bioresorbable scaffold: will oversizing affect outcomes? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(3):299-300.
-
- Baber U, Mehran R, Sharma SK, Brar S, et al. Impact of the everolimus-eluting stent on stent thrombosis: a meta-analysis of 13 randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(15):1569-1577.
-
- Goel S, Pasam RT, Chava S, Sharma A. 3-4 year outcomes of the absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus second generation drug eluting stent: a meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;95:216-223.
-
- Sorrentino S, Giustino G, Mehran R, et al. Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting metallic stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:3055-3066.
-
- Cassese S, Byrne RA, Ndrepepa G, et al. Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting metallic stents: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2016;387:537-544.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
