Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan 21:10:2784.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02784. eCollection 2019.

Personality Predictors of Yips and Choking Susceptibility

Affiliations

Personality Predictors of Yips and Choking Susceptibility

Philip Clarke et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

The ability to perform under heightened levels of pressures is one of the largest discriminators of those who achieve success in competition and those who do not. There are several phenomena associated with breakdowns in an athlete's performance in a high-pressure environment, collectively known as paradoxical performances. The two most prevalent and researched forms of paradoxical performance are the yips and choking. The aim of the current study is to investigate a range of psychological traits (fear of negative evaluation, individual differences, anxiety sensitivity, self-consciousness, perfectionistic self-presentation, and perfectionism) and their ability to predict susceptibility to choking and the yips in an experienced athlete sample. 155 athletes (Golfers n = 86; Archers n = 69) completed six trait measures and a self-report measure of yips or choking experience. The prevalence rate for choking and yips in both archers and golfers was 67.7 and 39.4%, respectively. A 2 × 2 × 2 MANOVA and discriminant function analysis revealed that a combination of 11 variables correctly classified 71% of choking and non-choking participants. Furthermore, analysis confirmed that a combination of four variables correctly classified 69% of the yips and non-yips affected participants. In this first study to examine both paradoxical performances simultaneously, these findings revealed that for the yips, all predictors stemmed from social sources (i.e., perfectionistic self-presentation), whereas choking was associated with anxiety and perfectionism, as well as social traits. This important distinction identified here should now be tested to understand the role of these traits as development or consequential factors of choking and the yips.

Keywords: choking; individual characteristics; paradoxical performance; performance under pressure; personality; stress; yips.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Clarke et al. (2015) Yips Classification Model.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
The hypothesized Yips Predictive Model (YPM).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
The hypothesized Choking Predictive Model (CPM).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
The Choking Predictive Model (CPM).
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
The Yips Predictive Model (YPM).

References

    1. Adler C. H., Crews D., Kahol K., Santello M., Noble B., Hentz J. G., et al. (2011). Are the yips a task-specific dystonia or “golfer’s cramp?” Mov. Disord. 26 1993–1996. 10.1002/mds.23824 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allen M. S., Greenless I., Jones M. (2013). Personality in sport: a comprehensive review. Int. Rev. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 6 184–208. 10.1080/1750984x.2013.769614 - DOI
    1. Altenmüller E., Jabusch H. C. (2009). Focal hand dystonia in musicians: phenomenology, etiology and psychological trigger factors. J. Hand Ther. 22 144–155. 10.1016/j.jht.2008.11.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association [APA] (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5®). Maine Avenue: American Psychiatric Association.
    1. Baumeister R. F. (1984). Choking under pressure: self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skilful performance. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 46 610–620. 10.1037//0022-3514.46.3.610 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources