Assessing Risk Among Correctional Community Probation Populations: Predicting Reoffense With Mobile Neurocognitive Assessment Software
- PMID: 32038355
- PMCID: PMC6992536
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02926
Assessing Risk Among Correctional Community Probation Populations: Predicting Reoffense With Mobile Neurocognitive Assessment Software
Abstract
We seek to address current limitations of forensic risk assessments by introducing the first mobile, self-scoring, risk assessment software that relies on neurocognitive testing to predict reoffense. This assessment, run entirely on a tablet, measures decision-making via a suite of neurocognitive tests in less than 30 minutes. The software measures several cognitive and decision-making traits of the user, including impulsivity, empathy, aggression, and several other traits linked to reoffending. Our analysis measured whether this assessment successfully predicted recidivism by testing probationers in a large urban city (Houston, TX, United States) from 2017 to 2019. To determine predictive validity, we used machine learning to yield cross-validated receiver-operator characteristics. Results gave a recidivism prediction value of 0.70, making it comparable to commonly used risk assessments. This novel approach diverges from traditional self-reporting, interview-based, and criminal-records-based approaches, and can also add a protective layer against bias, while strengthening model accuracy in predicting reoffense. In addition, subjectivity is eliminated and time-consuming administrative efforts are reduced. With continued data collection, this approach opens the possibility of identifying different levels of recidivism risk, by crime type, for any age, or gender, and seeks to steer individuals appropriately toward rehabilitative programs. Suggestions for future research directions are provided.
Keywords: machine learning; neurocognitive; neurolaw; predictive validity; risk assessment.
Copyright © 2020 Haarsma, Davenport, White, Ormachea, Sheena and Eagleman.
Figures




References
-
- Ægisdóttir S., White M. J., Spengler P. M., Maugherman A. S., Anderson L. A., Cook R. S., et al. (2006). The meta-analysis of clinical judgment project: fifty-six years of accumulated research on clinical versus statistical prediction. The Counseling Psychologist 34 341–382. 10.1177/0011000005285875 - DOI
-
- Alper M., Durose M. R., Markman J. (2018). Update on Prisoner Recidivism: A 9-Year Follow-up Period (2005-2014). Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report, NCJ 250975. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
-
- Andrews D., Dowden C. (2007). The risk–need–responsivity model of assessment and human service in prevention and corrections: crime-prevention jurisprudence. Can. J. Criminol. Crim. Justice 49 439–464. 10.3138/cjccj.49.4.439 - DOI
-
- Andrews D. A., Bonta J. (1995). The Level of Service Inventory - Revised. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
-
- Austin J. (2004). The proper and improper use of risk assessment in corrections. Fed. Sentenc. Rep. 16 194–199. 10.1525/fsr.2004.16.3.194 - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources