Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Dec 11;14(6):566-573.
doi: 10.4103/1735-5362.272565. eCollection 2019 Dec.

Naringenin potentiated β-sitosterol healing effect on the scratch wound assay

Affiliations

Naringenin potentiated β-sitosterol healing effect on the scratch wound assay

Manal Mohammad Abbas et al. Res Pharm Sci. .

Abstract

In the present investigation scratch wound assay was used to study the ability of several combinations of each flavonoid (chrysin, naringenin or resveratrol) with β-sitosterol to heal wounds in vitro. MTT test was performed to determine if the combination of flavonoid with β-sitosterol was toxic to fibroblasts or not. Also, superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) concentrations were measured. The best closure rates were obtained with β-sitosterol combined with naringenin and β-sitosterol combined with resveratrol. The combination that produced the best closure rate namely β-sitosterol with naringenin increased SOD activity significantly. However, this combination was not better than naringenin or β-sitosterol alone in reducing IL-β concentration. The results of MTT test indicated that the combination as well as β-sitosterol alone or naringenin alone has no toxic effect on fibroblasts. In conclusion, the combination of β-sitosterol and naringenin exerted a synergistic effect on wound closure without decreasing the viability of fibroblasts, increased antioxidant defense mechanism and decreased IL-β.

Keywords: Beta-sitosterol; Interleukin-1β; Naringenin; SOD; Scratch wound assay; Synergism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Scratch wound assay. (A) Negative control at zero time, (B) negative control after 24 h, (C) β-sitosterol at 50 μM after 24 h, (D) β-sitosterol at 100 μM after 24 h, (E) naringenin at 50 μM after 24 h, (F) naringenin at 100 μM after 24 h, (G) naringenin and β-sitosterol at 50 μM after 24 h, (H) naringenin and β-sitosterol at 100 μM after 24 h and (I) platelet-derived growth factor at 10 nM after 24 h.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Evaluation of antoproliferative effects of β-sitosterol, naringenin or their combination on fibroblasts using MTT assay.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Effect of different treatments on levels of SOD. In all groups except the first one (no wound), a linear wound on monolayer cells was created using a sterile 100 μL plastic pipette tip. *** Indicates significant differences in comparison with no treatment group (P < 0.001). ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 show significant differences between indicated groups. SOD, superoxidae dismutase
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Effect of different treatments on level of IL-1β. In all groups except the first one (no wound), a linear wound on monolayer cells was created using a sterile 100 μL plastic pipette tip. *** Indicates significant differences in comparison with no treatment group (P < 0.001). Interleukin-1β, IL-1β.

References

    1. Hakim N, Andersson LC, Nettelblad H, Kratz G, editors. From Basic Wound Healing to Modern Skin Engineering. London: Springer; 2009. Artificial Organs; pp. 93–105.
    1. Cukjati D, Reberšek S, Miklavčič D. A reliable method of determining wound healing rate. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2001;39(2):263–271. - PubMed
    1. Toriseva M, Kähäri VM. Proteinases in cutaneous wound healing. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009;66(2):203–224. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Diegelmann RF. From the selected works of Robert F. Diegelmann Ph.D. Front Biosci. 2004;9:283–289. - PubMed
    1. Hu Y, Liang D, Li X, Liu HH, Zhang X, Zheng M, et al. The role of interleukin-1 in wound biology. Part I: Murine in silico and in vitro experimental analysis. Anesth Analg. 2010;111(6):1525–1533. - PubMed