Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):56.
doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-2472-1.

Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): psychometric properties of the online Spanish version in a clinical sample with emotional disorders

Amanda Díaz-García  1 , Alberto González-Robles  2 , Sonia Mor  2 , Adriana Mira  3 , Soledad Quero  2 , Azucena García-Palacios  2   4 , Rosa María Baños  3   4 , Cristina Botella  2   4
Affiliations

Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): psychometric properties of the online Spanish version in a clinical sample with emotional disorders

Amanda Díaz-García et al. BMC Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) is the most widely and frequently used scale to assess positive and negative affect. The PANAS has been validated in several languages, and it has shown excellent psychometric properties in the general population and some clinical samples, such as forensic samples, substance users, and adult women with fibromyalgia. Nevertheless, the psychometric properties of the scale have not yet been examined in clinical samples with anxiety, depressive, and adjustment disorders. In addition, the proliferation of Internet-based treatments has led to the development of a wide range of assessments conducted online with digital versions of pen and paper self-report questionnaires. However, no validations have been carried out to analyze the psychometric properties of the online version of the PANAS. The present study investigates the psychometric properties of the online Spanish version of the PANAS in a clinical sample of individuals with emotional disorders.

Methods: The sample was composed of 595 Spanish adult volunteers with a diagnosis of depressive disorder (n = 237), anxiety disorder (n = 284), or adjustment disorder (n = 74). Factor structure, construct validity, internal consistency, and sensitivity to change were analyzed.

Results: Confirmatory factor analysis yielded a latent structure of two independent factors, consistent with previous validations of the instrument. The analyses showed adequate convergent and discriminant validity, good internal consistency as well as sensitivity to change.

Conclusions: Overall, the results obtained in this study show that the online version of the PANAS has adequate psychometric properties for the assessment of positive and negative affect in a Spanish clinical population.

Keywords: Assessment; Emotional disorders; Online; Positive and negative affect; Psychometrics; Validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) model. Note. Rectangles are measured variables, the large circles are the latent construct, and ellipses are residual variances. Factor loadings are standardized
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Gray EK, Watson D. Assessing positive and negative affect via self-report. Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment; 2007.
    1. Rosenberg Erika L. Levels of Analysis and the Organization of Affect. Review of General Psychology. 1998;2(3):247–270. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.247. - DOI
    1. Gross J, Sutton SK, Ketelaar T. Relations between affect and personality: support for the affect-level and affective-reactivity views. Clin Soc Psychol Bull. 1998;24(3):279–288.
    1. Parkinson B, Totterdell P, Briner R, Reynolds S. Changing moods: the psychology of mood and mood regulation. 1996.
    1. Lucas RE, Diener E, Larsen RJ. Positive psychological assessment: a handbook of models and measures. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2003. Measuring positive emotions; pp. 201–218.

Publication types