Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Apr;97(4):347-362.
doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.23984. Epub 2020 Feb 10.

Cell Image Classification: A Comparative Overview

Affiliations
Review

Cell Image Classification: A Comparative Overview

Mohammad Shifat-E-Rabbi et al. Cytometry A. 2020 Apr.

Abstract

Cell image classification methods are currently being used in numerous applications in cell biology and medicine. Applications include understanding the effects of genes and drugs in screening experiments, understanding the role and subcellular localization of different proteins, as well as diagnosis and prognosis of cancer from images acquired using cytological and histological techniques. The article also reviews three main approaches for cell image classification most often used: numerical feature extraction, end-to-end classification with neural networks (NNs), and transport-based morphometry (TBM). In addition, we provide comparisons on four different cell imaging datasets to highlight the relative strength of each method. The results computed using four publicly available datasets show that numerical features tend to carry the best discriminative information for most of the classification tasks. Results also show that NN-based methods produce state-of-the-art results in the dataset that contains a relatively large number of training samples. Data augmentation or the choice of a more recently reported architecture does not necessarily improve the classification performance of NNs in the datasets with limited number of training samples. If understanding and visualization are desired aspects, TBM methods can offer the ability to invert classification functions, and thus can aid in the interpretation of results. These and other comparison outcomes are discussed with the aim of clarifying the advantages and disadvantages of each method. © 2020 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Keywords: cell biology; computational biology; digital pathology; image informatics.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

Literature Cited

    1. Hooke R. In: Hooke R, Martyn J, Allestry J, editors. Micrographia, or, Some physiological descriptions of minute bodies made by magnifying glasses: With observations and inquiries thereupon. London, UK: The Royal Society, 1961.
    1. Mazzarello P. A unifying concept: The history of cell theory. Nat Cell Biol 1999;1(1):E13-E15.
    1. Perlman ZE, Slack MD, Feng Y, Mitchison TJ, Wu LF, Altschuler SJ. Multidimensional drug profiling by automated microscopy. Science 2004;306(5699):1194-1198.
    1. Scheeder C, Heigwer F, Boutros M. Machine learning and image-based profiling in drug discovery. Curr Opin Syst Biol 2018;10:43-52.
    1. Xu JJ, Henstock PV, Dunn MC, Smith AR, Chabot JR, de Graaf D. Cellular imaging predictions of clinical drug-induced liver injury. Toxicol Sci 2008;105(1):97-105.

Publication types