Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Mar 1;25(2):e291-e298.
doi: 10.4317/medoral.23353.

Assessment of clinical outcomes and histomorphometric findings in alveolar ridge augmentation procedures with allogeneic bone block grafts: A systematic review and meta-analysis

F Pérez-González  1 , P Molinero-Mourelle, L Sánchez-Labrador, L-M Sáez-Alcaide, A Limones, J Cortés-Bretón Brinkmann, J López-Quiles
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Assessment of clinical outcomes and histomorphometric findings in alveolar ridge augmentation procedures with allogeneic bone block grafts: A systematic review and meta-analysis

F Pérez-González et al. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. .

Abstract

Background: This systematic literature review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of allogeneic bone blocks for ridge augmentation by assessing block survival rates and subsequent implant survival, including post-surgical complications and histomorphometric analysis.

Material and methods: An electronic and manual search among references, was conducted up to April 2019 by two independent authors. Inclusion criteria were: human clinical trials in which the outcomes of allogeneic bone block grafts were evaluated by means of their survival rates and subsequent implant success rates.

Results: Seven articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. A total of 323 allogeneic block grafts were monitored for a minimum of 12 months follow-up after surgery, of which thirteen (4.02%) failed. Regarding the cumulative implant survival rate, the weighted mean was 97.36%, computed from 501 implants. Histologic and histomorphometric analysis showed that allogeneic block grafts presented some clinical and microstructural differences in comparison with autologous block grafts.

Conclusions: Atrophic alveolar crest reconstruction with allogeneic bone block grafts would appear a feasible alternative to autologous bone block grafts, obtaining a low block graft failure rate, similar implant survival rate and fewer postoperative complications. Further investigations generating long term data are needed to confirm these findings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest Authors do not have any conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the inclusion and exclusion of studies in this review.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Survival rates of allogenic block graft.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Survival rate of implants placed in allogeneic block graft.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Wallace S, Gellin R. Clinical evaluation of freeze-dried cancellous block allografts for ridge augmentation and implant placement in the maxilla. Implant Dent. 2010;19:272–9. - PubMed
    1. Pimentel AC, Napimoga MH, Manzi MR, Sendyk WR. Reconstruction of the edentulous mandible with fresh frozen bone grafts and implants: a 4-years report of a prospective clinical study. Cell Tissue Bank. 2014;15:1–6. - PubMed
    1. Barone A, Varanini P, Orlando B, Tonelli P, Covani U. Deep-frozen allogeneic onlay bone grafts for reconstruction of atrophic maxillary alveolar ridges: a preliminary study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:1300–06. - PubMed
    1. Nissan J, Ghelfan O, Mardinger O, Calderon S, Chaushu G. Efficacy of cancellous block allograft augmentation prior to implant placement in the posterior atrophic mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011;13:279–85. - PubMed
    1. Contar CMM, Sarot JR, Costa MB. Fresh-frozen bone allografts in maxillary ridge augmentation: histologic analysis. J Oral Implantol. 2011;37:223–31. - PubMed

Substances