Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Mar 1;25(2):e299-e310.
doi: 10.4317/medoral.23355.

Salivary biomarkers for diagnosis of systemic diseases and malignant tumors. A systematic review

M Meleti  1 , D Cassi, P Vescovi, G Setti, T-A Pertinhez, M-E Pezzi
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Salivary biomarkers for diagnosis of systemic diseases and malignant tumors. A systematic review

M Meleti et al. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. .

Abstract

Background: Saliva evaluation could be a possible alternative to blood and/or tissue analyses, for researching specific molecules associated to the presence of systemic diseases and malignancies. The present systematic review has been designed in order to answer to the question "are there significant associations between specific salivary biomarkers and diagnosis of systemic diseases or malignancies?".

Materials and methods: The Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement was used to guide the review. The combinations of "saliva" and "systemic diseases" or "diagnosis" or "biomarkers" or "cancers" or "carcinoma" or "tumors", were used to search Medline, Scopus and Web of Science databases. Endpoint of research has been set at May 2019. Studies were classified into 3 groups according to the type of disease investigated for diagnosis: 1) malignant tumors; 2) neurologic diseases and 3) inflammatory/metabolic/cardiovascular diseases. Assessment of quality has been assigned according to a series of questions proposed by the National Institute of Health. Level of evidence was assessed using the categories proposed in the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based medicine (CEMB) levels for diagnosis (2011).

Results: Seventy-nine studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Fifty-one (64%) investigated malignant tumors, 14 (17.5%) neurologic and 14 (18.5%) inflammatory/cardiovascular/metabolic diseases. Among studies investigating malignant tumors, 12 (23.5%) were scored as "good" and 11 of these reported statistically significant associations between salivary molecules and pathology. Two and 5 studies were found to have a good quality, among those evaluating the association between salivary biomarkers and neurologic and inflammatory/metabolic/cardiovascular diseases, respectively.

Conclusions: The present systematic review confirms the existence of some "good" quality evidence to support the role of peculiar salivary biomarkers for diagnosis of systemic diseases (e.g. lung cancer and EGFR).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Search strategy.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Aro K, Wei F, Wong DT, Tu M. Saliva Liquid Biopsy for Point-of-Care Applications. Front Public Health. 2017;5:77. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yager P, Domingo GJ, Gerdes J. Point-of-Care Diagnostics for Global Health. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2008;10:107–44. - PubMed
    1. Kaczor-Urbanowicz KE, MartinCarreras-Presas C, Aro K, Tu M, Garcia-Godoy F, Wong DT. Saliva diagnostics - Current views and directions. Exp Biol Med. 2017;242:459–72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools.
    1. Phillips B. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine-Levels of Evidence. Retrieved from http://www.cebm.net/oxford-centre-evidence-based-medicine-levels-evidenc...