Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 6;17(3):1037.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17031037.

Examining the Feasibility and Acceptability of Valuing the Arabic Version of SF-6D in a Lebanese Population

Affiliations

Examining the Feasibility and Acceptability of Valuing the Arabic Version of SF-6D in a Lebanese Population

Samer A Kharroubi et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Objectives: The SF-6D is a preference-based measure of health developed to generate utility values from the SF-36. The aim of this pilot study was to examine the feasibility and acceptability of using the standard gamble (SG) technique to generate preference-based values for the Arabic version of SF-6D in a Lebanese population. Methods: The SF-6D was translated into Arabic using forward and backward translations. Forty-nine states defined by the SF-6D were selected using an orthogonal design and grouped into seven sets. A gender-occupation stratified sample of 126 Lebanese adults from the American University of Beirut were recruited to value seven states and the pits using SG. The sample size is appropriate for a pilot study, but smaller than the sample required for a full valuation study. Both interviewers and interviewees reported their understanding and effort levels in the SG tasks. Mean and individual level multivariate regression models were fitted to estimate preference weights for all SF-6D states. The models were compared with those estimated in the UK. Results: Interviewers reported few problems in completing SG tasks (0.8% with a lot of problems) and good respondent understanding (5.6% with little effort and concentration), and 25% of respondents reported the SG task was difficult. A total of 992 SG valuations were useable for econometric modeling. There was no significant change in the test-retest values from 21 subjects. The mean absolute errors in the mean and individual level models were 0.036 and 0.050, respectively, both of which were lower than the UK results. The random effects model adequately predicts the SG values, with the worst state having a value of 0.322 compared to 0.271 in the UK. Conclusion: This pilot confirmed that it was feasible and acceptable to generate preference values with the SG method for the Arabic SF-6D in a Lebanese population. However, further work is needed to extend this to a more representative population, and to explore why no utility values below zero were observed.

Keywords: Lebanese; SF-6D; preference-based measure; reliability; standard gamble; validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests, except for the copyright to SF-6D held by the University of Sheffield who charge a royalty to commercial users.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Histogram and descriptive statistics for the adjusted health state valuations (n = 992).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Actual and predicted health state valuations for the RE model.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Drummond M.F., Sculpher M., O’Brien B., Stoddart G.L., Torrance G.W. Oxford Medical Publications. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 2005. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programs.
    1. National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal 2013. National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE); London, UK: 2013. - PubMed
    1. The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Pharmacoeconomic Guidelines Around the World. [(accessed on 16 July 2019)];2019 Available online: https://tools.ispor.org/peguidelines/
    1. Brazier J.E., Ratcliffe J., Tsuchiya A., Solomon J. Measuring and Valuing Health for Economic Evaluation. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 2017.
    1. Torrance G.W. Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life. J. Chronic Dis. 1987;40:593–600. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90019-1. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources