Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 6;20(3):880.
doi: 10.3390/s20030880.

Quantitative Measurement of Rigidity in Parkinson´s Disease: A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Quantitative Measurement of Rigidity in Parkinson´s Disease: A Systematic Review

María Del Rosario Ferreira-Sánchez et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Rigidity is one of the cardinal symptoms of Parkinson´s disease (PD). Present in up 89% of cases, it is typically assessed with clinical scales. However, these instruments show limitations due to their subjectivity and poor intra- and inter-rater reliability. To compile all of the objective quantitative methods used to assess rigidity in PD and to study their validity and reliability, a systematic review was conducted using the Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases. Studies from January 1975 to June 2019 were included, all of which were written in English. The Strengthening the Reporting of observational studies in Epidemiology Statement (STROBE) checklist for observational studies was used to assess the methodological rigor of the included studies. Thirty-six studies were included. Rigidity was quantitatively assessed in three ways, using servomotors, inertial sensors, and biomechanical and neurophysiological study of muscles. All methods showed good validity and reliability, good correlation with clinical scales, and were useful for detecting rigidity and studying its evolution. People with PD exhibit higher values in terms of objective muscle stiffness than healthy controls. Rigidity depends on the angular velocity and articular amplitude of the mobilization applied. There are objective, valid, and reliable methods that can be used to quantitatively assess rigidity in people with PD.

Keywords: Parkinson’s disease; assessment; rigidity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graphical representation of the total STROBE score.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tysnes O.B., Storstein A. Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. J. Neural Transm. 2017;124:901–905. doi: 10.1007/s00702-017-1686-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mutch W., Strudwick A., Roy S., Downie A. Parkinson’s disease: Disability, review, and management. Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.) 1986;293:675–677. doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6548.675. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moustafa A.A., Chakravarthy S., Phillips J.R., Gupta A., Keri S., Polner B., Frank M.J., Jahanshahi M. Motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease: A unified framework. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2016;68:727–740. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berardelli A., Sabra A., Hallett M. Physiological mechanisms of rigidity in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 1983;46:45–53. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.46.1.45. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patrick S.K., Denington A.A., Gauthier M.J.A., Member A., Gillard D.M., Prochazka A., Member S. Quantification of the UPDRS Rigidity Scale. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2001;9:31–41. doi: 10.1109/7333.918274. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types