Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):40.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-1942-y.

Scales to evaluate developmental stage and professional identity formation in medical students, residents, and experienced doctors

Affiliations

Scales to evaluate developmental stage and professional identity formation in medical students, residents, and experienced doctors

Masami Tagawa. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: To respond to the growing need to cultivate medical trainees with professional identity, it is necessary to evaluate professional identity formation (PIF) in medical trainees to understand their state of PIF and apply this to medical education. Previous qualitative studies indicated that Kegan's human development model could explain medical trainees' PIF. I proposed a development scale (DS) to quantitatively evaluate the degree of maturation and socialization as a physician; however, one scale is not enough to illustrate the helical and complex process of development.

Methods: Using Kegan's model as the conceptual framework, scales that evaluate stage 2, 3, and 4, and higher stage-specific attributes were developed using data collected in a self-administered questionnaire (322 respondents), reliability analysis, group comparison, and analysis of individual DS scores. The respondents were 4th- and 6th-year medical students and 2nd-year residents at Kagoshima University, and experienced medical doctors (instructors).

Results: In addition to the DS, one self-administered questionnaire consisting of 27 items for stage 2, 3, 4, and higher stage-specific attribute scales was created. Students had the highest mean score in stage 2, and instructors had the highest mean score in stage 4 and higher stage scales. Individual analysis indicated that there were respondents with varied attributes in each group, that the average medical student might have inclusion preference typically seen at stage 3, and that the average instructor might have independent preference typically seen at stage 4 more than inclusion preference.

Conclusions: Combining multiple stage attribute-specific scales and DS scores could quantify the complexity and divergent processes of PIF. These scales could provide meaningful information about individuals, groups, and education in terms of professional development that is different from assessment data of medical knowledge or professional skills.

Keywords: Evaluation; Kegan’s model; Medical trainees; Professional identity formation; Socialization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

To the author’s knowledge, no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise, exits with respect to this work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A modified Kegan’s helix of evolutionary truces (- - ▶) [reference 16], and expected scale direction and areas of evaluation. SAS: stage-specific attribute scale; SAS-2: stage 2-specific attribute scale; SAS-3: stage 3-specific attribute scale; SAS-4: stage 4-specific attribute scale; SAS-h: stage 4 and higher-specific attribute scale
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean and standard deviation of SAS scores in five DS score classifications and number of respondents DS: developing scale; SAS: stage-specific attribute scale; SAS-2: stage 2-specific attribute scale; SAS-3: stage 3-specific attribute scale; SAS-4: stage 4-specific attribute scale; SAS-h: stage 4 and higher-specific attribute scale
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
SAS scores of respondents with DS scores of 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, and 90. If there were three or more respondents with these DS scores in each respondent group, two respondents from each group were randomly selected DS: developing scale; SAS: stage-specific attribute scale; SAS-2: stage 2-specific attribute scale; SAS-3: stage 3-specific attribute scale; SAS-4: stage 4-specific attribute scale; SAS-h: stage 4 and higher-specific attribute scale

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bebeau MJ. Evidence based character development. In: Kenny NP, Shelton WN, eds. Lost virtue professional character development in medical education. Oxford, England: Elsevier; 2006.
    1. Cooke M, Irby DM, O’Brien BC. Educating physicians: a call for reform of medical school and residency. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 2010.
    1. Bleakley Alan, Bligh John, Browne Julie. Medical Education for the Future. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2011. New Forms of Identity in a Runaway World of Medicine; pp. 81–91.
    1. Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Boundreau JD, Snell L, Steinert Y. Reframing medical education to support professional identity formation. Acad Med. 2014;89:1446–1451. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000427. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilson I, Cowin LS, Johnson M, Young H. Professional identity in medical students: pedagogical challenges to medical education. Teach Learn Med. 2013;25:369–373. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2013.827968. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources