Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):42.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-1950-y.

Medical students' perspectives on earning opportunities of self-employed physicians - realistic and relevant for the process of career choice?

Affiliations

Medical students' perspectives on earning opportunities of self-employed physicians - realistic and relevant for the process of career choice?

Tobias Deutsch et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Several studies report a substantial impact of financial considerations on the process of specialty choice and the willingness to establish one's own practice. In Germany, reliable information on self-employed physicians' earning opportunities is basically available, but not easily accessible and understandable for medical students. Misperceptions might contribute to recruitment problems in some fields, particularly in general practice. In order to identify a possible need for action, we investigated current German medical students' level of information regarding future earnings, and whether net earnings of general practitioners and other physicians working self-employed are estimated realistically. Additionally, we explored students' self-assessments regarding the extent of the impact of expected earnings on their personal career choice process.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire survey among fourth year (of six) medical students at one medical school (Leipzig). The participants estimated the net earnings of different physicians working self-employed. These estimations were compared with actual earnings data derived from a large German practice panel.

Results: Response rate was 73.6% (231/314). The participants' mean age was 24.9 years and 59.1% were women. On a 10-point scale ranging from 1 = 'no influence' to 10='very big influence', 92.6% of the participants described at least some (≥2) influence of earning expectations on their career choice process, and 66.2% stated this influence to be 5 or higher. Every fourth student (26.4%) would rather or definitely reject a certain specialty because of expected low earning opportunities. While 60.4% had already thought about future earnings, only 26.8% had obtained concrete information. Compared with the data derived from the practice panel, the participants substantially underestimated the earning opportunities in self-employed settings, including general practice (median: 4500 vs. 6417€). However, depending on the single estimations, between 87.7 and 95.6% of the students stated they were 'rather uncertain' or 'very uncertain' regarding their estimations.

Conclusions: Despite confirming a relevant impact of financial considerations on career choice, German fourth year medical students are not well informed about earning opportunities in self-employed settings. Providing easily understandable information could enhance transparency and might help students to consider financial issues of career choice on a realistic basis.

Keywords: Career choice; Earning opportunities; General practice; Germany; Income; Medical students; Primary health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Influence of expected earning opportunities on career choice as perceived by German medical students
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Students’ interest in future earning opportunities and information obtained prior to the study
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
German medical students’ estimations of a GP’s net earnings vs. comparable Figs. (ZI panel)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pfarrwaller E, Audétat M-C, Sommer J, Maisonneuve H, Bischoff T, Nendaz M, et al. An expanded conceptual framework of medical students’ primary care career choice. Acad Med. 2017;92:1536–1542. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001676. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bennett KL, Phillips JP. Finding, recruiting, and sustaining the future primary care physician workforce: a new theoretical model of specialty choice process. Acad Med. 2010;85:S81–S88. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ed4bae. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bland CJ, Meurer LN, Maldonado G. Determinants of primary care specialty choice: a non-statistical meta-analysis of the literature. Acad Med. 1995;70:620–641. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199507000-00013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Campos-Outcalt D, Senf J, Pugno PA, McGaha AL. Family medicine specialty selection: a proposed research agenda. Fam Med. 2007;39:585–589. - PubMed
    1. Deutsch T, Lippmann S, Frese T, Sandholzer H. Who wants to become a general practitioner? Student and curriculum factors associated with choosing a GP career--a multivariable analysis with particular consideration of practice-orientated GP courses. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2015;33:47–53. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2015.1020661. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources