Comparative evaluation of biphasic insulin with metformin and triple oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA) in type 2 diabetes patients
- PMID: 32042260
- PMCID: PMC7000310
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2019.11.023
Comparative evaluation of biphasic insulin with metformin and triple oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA) in type 2 diabetes patients
Abstract
Introduction: The prevalence of secondary failure to oral hypoglycemic agents among type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients ranges from 30 to 60%. The alternative approaches to overcome this issue are either switching to triple oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA) or intensifying the regimen by adding insulin.
Objective: To compare the glycemic control achieved with biphasic insulin plus metformin and triple OHA in T2DM patients who were not adequately controlled with two OHA regimen.
Methods: A qualitative prospective study was conducted at Asir diabetes center, Abha, KSA. Poorly controlled T2DM patients with two OHA for at least 1 year with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) >7.0% were included. Subjects were divided into group I (a third OHA was added to the existing two OHA regimen) and group II (switched over to Biphasic insulin and metformin). At baseline and 3-month intervals, level of HbA1C, Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG), Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG), Blood Pressure (BP), lipid profile and hypoglycemic episodes were obtained and evaluated for one year.
Results: 41.1% of patients were in group I and 58.9% were in group II. At the end of the study, there was a significant reduction in HbA1c in group II subjects comparing to group I (8.18 ± 1.32 vs 8.79 ± 1.81, p = 0.0238). FPG and PPG were improved also in group II. The mean body weight increased from baseline in group II is +4.48 kg and decreased from baseline in group I (-0.46 kg). 11.3% from group I and 23.7% from group II reported hypoglycaemic incidences.
Conclusion: Biphasic insulin and metformin regimen could be an appropriate therapeutic option for achieving good glycemic control compared with triple OHA in patients with two OHA failure.
Keywords: Biphasic insulin; Glycaemic control; Metformin; Oralhypoglycemic agents; Type 2 diabetes.
© 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Comparing dual oral agents plus insulin vs. Triple oral agents in uncontrolled type II diabetes: A pilot study.PLoS One. 2024 Nov 21;19(11):e0311435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311435. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39570934 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 versus exenatide in subjects with type 2 diabetes failing to achieve glycemic control with metformin and a sulfonylurea.Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Jan;25(1):65-75. doi: 10.1185/03007990802597951. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009. PMID: 19210140 Clinical Trial.
-
Repaglinide : a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(6):389-411. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422060-00005. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004. PMID: 15099124 Review.
-
Real-World Clinical Effectiveness and Tolerability of Hydroxychloroquine 400 Mg in Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes Subjects who are not Willing to Initiate Insulin Therapy (HYQ-Real-World Study).Curr Diabetes Rev. 2019;15(6):510-519. doi: 10.2174/1573399815666190425182008. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2019. PMID: 31713476
-
Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogues Versus Regular Human Insulin: A Meta-Analysis of Effects on Glycemic Control in Patients with Diabetes.Diabetes Ther. 2020 Mar;11(3):573-584. doi: 10.1007/s13300-019-00732-w. Epub 2019 Dec 23. Diabetes Ther. 2020. PMID: 31873857 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Composite cardiovascular risk and BMI affected comparative profiles of BIAsp 30 + metformin vs BIAsp 30 monotherapy: a MERIT post-hoc analysis.Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 18;11(1):4131. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83410-x. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33602996 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The Efficacy and Safety of Hypoglycemic Agents in the Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Iran J Public Health. 2025 Jul;54(7):1350-1363. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v54i7.19114. Iran J Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40777898 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A cross-sectional study evaluating insulin injection techniques and the impact of instructions from various healthcare professionals on insulin users in the southern region of Saudi Arabia.PeerJ. 2025 May 12;13:e19394. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19394. eCollection 2025. PeerJ. 2025. PMID: 40376558 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing dual oral agents plus insulin vs. Triple oral agents in uncontrolled type II diabetes: A pilot study.PLoS One. 2024 Nov 21;19(11):e0311435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311435. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39570934 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American Diabetes Association Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: standards of medical care in diabetes–2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(Suppl. 1):S90–S102. - PubMed
-
- Bloomgarden Z. Is insulin the preferred treatment for HbA1c >9%? J. Diabetes. 2017;9(9):814–816. - PubMed
-
- Buse J.B., Wolffenbuttel B.H., Herman W.H. DURAbility of basal versus lispro mix 75/25 insulin efficacy (DURABLE) trial 24-week results: safety and efficacy of insulin lispro mix 75/25 versus insulin glargine added to oral antihyperglycemic drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(6):1007–1013. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Eurich D.T., Simpson S.H., Majumdar S.R. Secondary failure rates associated with Metformin and sulphonylurea therapy for T2DM patients. Pharmacotherapy. 2005;25(6):810–816. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources