Comparative evaluation of biphasic insulin with metformin and triple oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA) in type 2 diabetes patients
- PMID: 32042260
- PMCID: PMC7000310
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2019.11.023
Comparative evaluation of biphasic insulin with metformin and triple oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA) in type 2 diabetes patients
Abstract
Introduction: The prevalence of secondary failure to oral hypoglycemic agents among type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients ranges from 30 to 60%. The alternative approaches to overcome this issue are either switching to triple oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA) or intensifying the regimen by adding insulin.
Objective: To compare the glycemic control achieved with biphasic insulin plus metformin and triple OHA in T2DM patients who were not adequately controlled with two OHA regimen.
Methods: A qualitative prospective study was conducted at Asir diabetes center, Abha, KSA. Poorly controlled T2DM patients with two OHA for at least 1 year with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) >7.0% were included. Subjects were divided into group I (a third OHA was added to the existing two OHA regimen) and group II (switched over to Biphasic insulin and metformin). At baseline and 3-month intervals, level of HbA1C, Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG), Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG), Blood Pressure (BP), lipid profile and hypoglycemic episodes were obtained and evaluated for one year.
Results: 41.1% of patients were in group I and 58.9% were in group II. At the end of the study, there was a significant reduction in HbA1c in group II subjects comparing to group I (8.18 ± 1.32 vs 8.79 ± 1.81, p = 0.0238). FPG and PPG were improved also in group II. The mean body weight increased from baseline in group II is +4.48 kg and decreased from baseline in group I (-0.46 kg). 11.3% from group I and 23.7% from group II reported hypoglycaemic incidences.
Conclusion: Biphasic insulin and metformin regimen could be an appropriate therapeutic option for achieving good glycemic control compared with triple OHA in patients with two OHA failure.
Keywords: Biphasic insulin; Glycaemic control; Metformin; Oralhypoglycemic agents; Type 2 diabetes.
© 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures
References
-
- American Diabetes Association Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: standards of medical care in diabetes–2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(Suppl. 1):S90–S102. - PubMed
-
- Bloomgarden Z. Is insulin the preferred treatment for HbA1c >9%? J. Diabetes. 2017;9(9):814–816. - PubMed
-
- Buse J.B., Wolffenbuttel B.H., Herman W.H. DURAbility of basal versus lispro mix 75/25 insulin efficacy (DURABLE) trial 24-week results: safety and efficacy of insulin lispro mix 75/25 versus insulin glargine added to oral antihyperglycemic drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(6):1007–1013. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Eurich D.T., Simpson S.H., Majumdar S.R. Secondary failure rates associated with Metformin and sulphonylurea therapy for T2DM patients. Pharmacotherapy. 2005;25(6):810–816. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources