Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Winter;11(1):100-104.
doi: 10.22088/cjim.11.1.100.

Rate of urinary tract infection after urodynamic study in pelvic floor clinic

Zinat Ghanbari  1 , Fedyeh Haghollahi  2 , Tahere Eftekhr  1 , Tahere Froghifar  3 , Mamak Shariat  4 , Maryam Hajihashemy  5 , Mohsen Ayati  6
Affiliations

Rate of urinary tract infection after urodynamic study in pelvic floor clinic

Zinat Ghanbari et al. Caspian J Intern Med. 2020 Winter.

Abstract

Background: One of the complications of urodynamic study is urinary tract infection. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of urinary tract infection (UTI) after UDS in patients referred to the pelvic floor clinic with regard to the specific conditions of these patients, such as presence of pelvic organ prolapse and high post voiding residual volume (PVR).

Methods: In a prospective descriptive-analytic study, 146 female candidates for UDS from January 2016 to June 2017 entered the study. Patients were examined for urinary tract infection before UDS (up to 5 days before USD) and were enrolled in the study if they did not have bacteriuria or urinary tract infection. Patients did not receive antibiotic prophylaxis before performing UDS. The patients were asked to do U/A and U/C three days after the UDS test.

Results: Among the 146 patients, 9 (6.2%) patients had considerable bacteriuria and 7 (4.8%) patients had UTI. The mean maximum detrusor pressure during urination and abnormal PVR before UDS had a significant correlation with positive urinary cultures after UDS (p<0.05).

Conclusion: The results showed that this diagnostic procedure is low risk and the prophylactic antibiotic therapy is not required before UDS in pelvic floor clinic. It seems that prophylactic antibiotic therapy is only appropriate in case of PVR greater than 50 ml and possibly of the high detrusor pressure.

Keywords: Pelvic floor; Urinary tract infection; Urodynamic study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have indicated that they have no conflicts of interests regarding the content of this article.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Foon R, Tooz-Hobson P, Latthe P. Prophylactic antibiotics to reduce the risk of urinary tract infections after urodynamic studies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:CD008224. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ku JH, Kim SW, Kim HH, et al. Patient experience with a Urodynamic study: a prospective study in 208 patients. J Urol. 2004;171:2307–10. - PubMed
    1. Gürbüz C, Güner B, Atis G, Canat L, Caskurlu T. Are prophylactic antibiotics necessary for urodynamic study? Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2013;29:326–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mirone V, Franco M. Clinical aspects of antimicrobial prophylaxis for invasive urological procedures. J Chemother. 2014;26:S1–S13. - PubMed
    1. Dass AK, Lo TS, Khanuengkitkong S, Tan YL. Bacteriuria and safety of female urodynamic studies. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:677–82. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources