Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2019 Dec;8(6):593-595.
doi: 10.21037/gs.2019.11.24.

A tale of two operations: re-excision as a quality measure

Affiliations
Editorial

A tale of two operations: re-excision as a quality measure

Leisha C Elmore et al. Gland Surg. 2019 Dec.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Comment on

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1233-41. 10.1056/NEJMoa022152 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kummerow KL, Du L, Penson DF, et al. Nationwide trends in mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg 2015;150:9-16. 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2895 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McCahill LE, Single RM, Aiello Bowles EJ, et al. Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery. JAMA 2012;307:467-75. 10.1001/jama.2012.43 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Havel L, Naik H, Ramirez L, et al. Impact of the SSO-ASTRO margin guideline on rates of re-excision after lumpectomy for breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2019;26:1238-44. 10.1245/s10434-019-07247-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Waljee JF, Hu ES, Newman LA, et al. Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15:1297-303. 10.1245/s10434-007-9777-x - DOI - PubMed