Distribution and phenotypes of hemifacial microsomia and its association with other anomalies
- PMID: 32042718
- PMCID: PMC6995827
- DOI: 10.4041/kjod.2020.50.1.33
Distribution and phenotypes of hemifacial microsomia and its association with other anomalies
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the distribution and phenotypes of hemifacial microsomia (HFM) and its association with other anomalies.
Methods: This study included 249 Korean patients with HFM, whose charts, photographs, radiographs, and/or computed tomography scans acquired during 1998-2018 were available from Seoul National University Hospital and Dental Hospital. Prevalence according to sex, side involvement, degree of mandibular deformity, compensatory growth of the mandibular body, and Angle's classification, and its association with other anomalies were statistically analyzed.
Results: Prevalence was not different between male and female patients (55.0% vs. 45.0%, p > 0.05). Unilateral HFM (UHFM) was more prevalent than bilateral HFM (BHFM) (86.3% vs. 13.7%, p < 0.001). Although distribution of the Pruzansky-Kaban types differed significantly in patients with UHFM (I, 53.0%; IIa, 18.6%; IIb, 24.7%; III, 3.7%; p < 0.001), no difference was observed in occurrence between the right and left sides (52.6% vs. 47.4%, p > 0.05). Among patients with BHFM, prevalence of different Pruzansky-Kaban types on the right and left sides was greater than that of the same type on both sides (67.6% vs. 32.4%, p < 0.05). Despite hypoplasia of the condyle/ramus complex, compensatory growth of the mandibular body on the ipsilateral side occurred in 35 patients (14.1%). Class I and II molar relationships were more prevalent than Class III molar relationships (93.2% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.001). Forty-eight patients (19.3%) had other anomalies, with 50.0% and 14.4% in the BHFM and UHFM groups (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Patients with HFM require individualized diagnosis and treatment planning because of diverse phenotypes and associations with other anomalies.
Keywords: Association with other anomalies; Distribution; Hemifacial macrosomia; Phenotype.
© 2020 The Korean Association of Orthodontists.
Conflict of interest statement
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Treatment modalities for Korean patients with unilateral hemifacial microsomia according to Pruzansky-Kaban types and growth stages.Korean J Orthod. 2020 Sep 25;50(5):336-345. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2020.50.5.336. Korean J Orthod. 2020. PMID: 32938826 Free PMC article.
-
Three-dimensional Hemifacial Microsomia Classification with New Subtypes Based on the Pruzansky and Kaban Classification.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 May 28;12(5):e5810. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005810. eCollection 2024 May. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024. PMID: 38808145 Free PMC article.
-
Distribution and Phenotype of Goldenhar Syndrome and Its Association With Other Anomalies.J Craniofac Surg. 2023 Oct 1;34(7):e664-e669. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009529. Epub 2023 Jul 7. J Craniofac Surg. 2023. PMID: 37417749
-
Interrelationships of the hemifacial microsomia-VATER, VATER, and sirenomelia phenotypes.Am J Med Genet. 1993 Aug 1;47(1):75-84. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320470116. Am J Med Genet. 1993. PMID: 8368258 Review.
-
Hemifacial microsomia: clinical features and pictographic representations of the OMENS classification system.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Dec;120(7):112e-113e. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000287383.35963.5e. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007. PMID: 18090735 Review.
Cited by
-
Exploring Progression and Differences in Facial Asymmetry for Hemifacial Microsomia and Isolated Microtia: Insights from Extensive 3D Analysis.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Nov;48(21):4239-4251. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04246-0. Epub 2024 Jul 9. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024. PMID: 38981899
-
Quantitative structural analysis of hemifacial microsomia mandibles in different age groups.Front Pediatr. 2023 Apr 17;11:1157607. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1157607. eCollection 2023. Front Pediatr. 2023. PMID: 37138574 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment modalities for Korean patients with unilateral hemifacial microsomia according to Pruzansky-Kaban types and growth stages.Korean J Orthod. 2020 Sep 25;50(5):336-345. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2020.50.5.336. Korean J Orthod. 2020. PMID: 32938826 Free PMC article.
-
Growth characteristics and classification systems of hemifacial microsomia: a literature review.Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 May 11;46(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40902-024-00427-8. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024. PMID: 38733452 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Identification of potential molecular mechanism related to craniofacial dysmorphism caused by FOXI3 deficiency.Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2024 Mar;12(3):e2411. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.2411. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2024. PMID: 38433559 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Grabb WC. The first and second branchial arch syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1965;36:485–508. - PubMed
-
- Longacre JJ. The surgical management of the first and second branchial arch syndrome. Br J Plast Surg. 1965;18:243–253. - PubMed
-
- Converse JM, Coccaro PJ, Becker M, Wood-Smith D. On hemifacial microsomia. The first and second branchial arch syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1973;51:268–279. - PubMed
-
- Figueroa AA, Pruzansky S. The external ear, mandible and other components of hemifacial microsomia. J Maxillofac Surg. 1982;10:200–211. - PubMed
-
- Cousley RR, Calvert ML. Current concepts in the understanding and management of hemifacial microsomia. Br J Plast Surg. 1997;50:536–551. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources