Floor and Ceiling Effects, Time to Completion, and Question Burden of PROMIS CAT Domains Among Shoulder and Knee Patients Undergoing Nonoperative and Operative Treatment
- PMID: 32043052
- PMCID: PMC6959920
- DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00015
Floor and Ceiling Effects, Time to Completion, and Question Burden of PROMIS CAT Domains Among Shoulder and Knee Patients Undergoing Nonoperative and Operative Treatment
Abstract
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computer adaptive tests (CATs) have emerged as an efficient technique for measuring patient-reported outcomes among orthopaedic patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the floor and ceiling (F/C) effects, time to completion (TTC), and question burden of PROMIS CATs administered to patients presenting to a shoulder and sports medicine orthopaedic clinic.
Methods: Patients prospectively completed PROMIS CATs including the physical function (PROMIS-PF) or upper-extremity function (PROMIS-UE), pain interference (PROMIS-PI), and depression (PROMIS-D) domains at their initial encounter and were retrospectively included in this study. Adult patients indicating a single problem involving either the shoulder or knee were included. Patients were also grouped as either preoperative or nonoperative. F/C effects were defined as the proportion of respondents scoring the highest (ceiling) or lowest (floor) possible score across a given domain.
Results: Included were 2,952 patients (average age, 51.0 ± 16.9 years). The PROMIS-UE, PROMIS-PF, and PROMIS-PI demonstrated negligible F/C effects across all shoulder and knee patients (<2%). The PROMIS-D displayed moderate to significant floor effects (13.9% to 18.9%) and a 0% ceiling effect in all main patient groups. The mean TTC and mean question burden of the PROMIS-UE, PROMIS-PF, and PROMIS-PI ranged from 45.3 to 54.4 seconds and 4.1 to 4.9 questions for all patient groups, while the PROMIS-D exhibited a TTC ranging from 20.9 to 38.6 seconds for all groups and a question burden that ranged from 6.2 to 6.7 questions.
Conclusions: The PROMIS-PF, PROMIS-UE, and PROMIS-PI demonstrated favorable F/C effects, TTC, and question burden among both nonoperative and preoperative patients. These findings justify consideration of the PROMIS-PF, PROMIS-UE, and PROMIS-PI for clinical and research applications involving shoulder and knee sports medicine patients. Additionally, we found moderate to significant floor effects for the PROMIS-D in all patient groups, which may be multifactorial in nature and may not be unexpected in patients with an isolated joint concern.
Clinical relevance: This study highlights the psychometric properties of PROMIS CAT forms for knee and shoulder patients. Understanding these basic properties is important in considering the adoption of PROMIS CAT forms for patients with musculoskeletal conditions.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
What Are the Floor and Ceiling Effects of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Computer Adaptive Test Domains in Orthopaedic Patients? A Systematic Review.Arthroscopy. 2020 Mar;36(3):901-912.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.09.022. Epub 2020 Jan 7. Arthroscopy. 2020. PMID: 31919023
-
PROMIS Upper Extremity underperforms psychometrically relative to American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score in patients undergoing primary rotator cuff repair.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Apr;31(4):718-725. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.10.021. Epub 2021 Nov 16. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022. PMID: 34798272
-
A Comparison of PROMIS UE Versus PF: Correlation to PROMIS PI and Depression, Ceiling and Floor Effects, and Time to Completion.J Hand Surg Am. 2019 Oct;44(10):901.e1-901.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.12.006. Epub 2019 Feb 4. J Hand Surg Am. 2019. PMID: 30733095
-
PROMIS Versus Legacy Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Sports Medicine Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Knee, Shoulder, and Hip Interventions: A Systematic Review.Iowa Orthop J. 2021 Dec;41(2):58-71. Iowa Orthop J. 2021. PMID: 34924871 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity (UE) Versus Physical Function (PF) Computer Adaptive Tests (CATs) in Upper Extremity Clinics.J Hand Surg Am. 2017 Nov;42(11):867-874. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jul 12. J Hand Surg Am. 2017. PMID: 28709794 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Patients Require Less Time to Complete Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Than Legacy Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Aug 10;3(5):e1413-e1419. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.06.011. eCollection 2021 Oct. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021. PMID: 34746845 Free PMC article.
-
Longitudinal Predictors of PROMIS Satisfaction With Social Roles and Activities After Shoulder and Knee Sports Orthopaedic Surgery in United States Military Servicemembers: An Observational Study.Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Jul 28;11(7):23259671231184834. doi: 10.1177/23259671231184834. eCollection 2023 Jul. Orthop J Sports Med. 2023. PMID: 37529526 Free PMC article.
-
Investigating the PROMIS Physical Function and Pain Interference Domains in Elite Athletes.Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jan 29;9(1):2325967120970195. doi: 10.1177/2325967120970195. eCollection 2021 Jan. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021. PMID: 33614792 Free PMC article.
-
Internal Consistency and Floor/Ceiling Effects of the Gross Motor Function Measure for Use with Children Affected by Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study.Curr Oncol. 2024 Sep 6;31(9):5291-5306. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31090390. Curr Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39330018 Free PMC article.
-
Relationships Between Health-Related Quality of Life and Speech Perception in Bimodal and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 28;13:859722. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859722. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35572246 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kadri O, Jildeh TR, Meldau JE, Blanchett J, Borowsky P, Muh S, Moutzouros V, Makhni EC. How long does it take for patients to complete PROMIS scores?: an assessment of PROMIS CAT questionnaires administered at an ambulatory sports medicine clinic. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018. Aug 14;6(8):2325967118791180. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Hancock KJ, Glass N, Anthony CA, Wolf BR, Hettrich CM, Albright J, Bollier M, Amendola A. PROMIS: a valid and efficient outcomes instrument for patients with ACL tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019. Jan;27(1):100-4. Epub 2018 Jul 4. - PubMed
-
- Hung M, Stuart AR, Higgins TF, Saltzman CL, Kubiak EN. Computerized adaptive testing using the PROMIS physical function item bank reduces test burden with less ceiling effects compared with the short musculoskeletal function assessment in orthopaedic trauma patients. J Orthop Trauma. 2014. Aug;28(8):439-43. - PubMed
-
- Strong B, Maloney M, Baumhauer J, Schaffer J, Houck JR, Hung M, Bounsanga J, Voss MW, Gu Y, Voloshin I. Psychometric evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function and pain interference computer adaptive test for subacromial impingement syndrome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019. Feb;28(2):324-9. Epub 2018 Oct 18. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous