Neuromuscular, hormonal and cardiovascular adaptations to eight-week HIIT and continuous aerobic training combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation
- PMID: 32043342
- DOI: 10.23736/S0022-4707.19.10277-0
Neuromuscular, hormonal and cardiovascular adaptations to eight-week HIIT and continuous aerobic training combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation
Abstract
Background: Whether high-or-low intensity exercise coupled with neuromuscular electrostimulation (NMES) affect IGF-1 and IGFBP-1 is unknown. The scope of this study was to test whether 8-week high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and continuous aerobic training (CA) combined with/without NMES performed at 65% and 120% of VO2max on a cycle ergometer induce different metabolic adaptations.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial with a parallel groups study design was used. Thirty healthy untrained male participants (age: 21.33±1.24 years, height: 177.80±5.97 cm, weight: 73.74±7.90 kg, lean body mass: 64.29±5.11 kg, percent body fat: 12.43±5.34%) voluntarily participated in this study. Six participants were allocated to Control, six to HIIT, six to HIIT+NMES, six to CA, and six to CA+NMES.
Results: Pre- to post-test IVO2max, blood lactate concentrations, O2 kinetics, peak torques at 60o/s and 180o/s were found statistically significant (P<0.05, P<0.001). IGF-1 pre 15 min in CA and IGF-1 post 30 min in HIIT group was found significantly higher compared to control group (16.93±8.40 vs. 6.05±4.25, P=0.024; 10.80±3.94 vs. 6.15±2.56, P=0.037), respectively. Additionally, IGFBP-1 were found significantly higher in CA+NMES group than HIIT group (0.95±0.67 vs. 1.23±0.56). Eight week post IGF-1/IGFBP-1 ratios were found higher in pre 15 min, post 30 min and post 24 h compared to baseline pre 15 min, post 30 min and post 24 h measurements in all groups (8.92±4.72 vs. 3.93±3.14; 9.41±3.72 vs. 3.99±1.76; 8.63±3.01 vs. 5.89±3.01, respectively). Also, IGFBP-1 post 30 min was significantly lower in HIIT+NMES while CA group showed significantly lower baseline and 24 h post IGFBP-1 compared to pre-test measurements (Z=-3.20, P=0.001; Z=-3.72, P=0.000; Z=-2.93, P=0.000).
Conclusions: HIIT and CA training induce different stimuli on IGF-1 and IGFBP-1 and NMES application combined with high-and-low intensity exercise is highly effective in improving athletic performance.
Similar articles
-
Exercise training with blood flow restriction has little effect on muscular strength and does not change IGF-1 in fit military warfighters.Growth Horm IGF Res. 2016 Apr;27:33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ghir.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Feb 17. Growth Horm IGF Res. 2016. PMID: 26922387
-
Six high-intensity interval training sessions over 5 days increases maximal oxygen uptake, endurance capacity, and sub-maximal exercise fat oxidation as much as 6 high-intensity interval training sessions over 2 weeks.J Sport Health Sci. 2021 Jul;10(4):478-487. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.06.008. Epub 2020 Jun 18. J Sport Health Sci. 2021. PMID: 32565243 Free PMC article.
-
Exercise-induced insulin-like growth factor I system concentrations after training in women.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013 Mar;45(3):420-8. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182750bd4. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013. PMID: 23034644 Clinical Trial.
-
Physiological and performance adaptations to high-intensity interval training.Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser. 2013;76:51-60. doi: 10.1159/000350256. Epub 2013 Jul 25. Nestle Nutr Inst Workshop Ser. 2013. PMID: 23899754 Review.
-
The Effect of Low-Volume High-Intensity Interval Training on Body Composition and Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Sports Med. 2019 Nov;49(11):1687-1721. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01167-w. Sports Med. 2019. PMID: 31401727
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous