Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 11;6(2):e19.
doi: 10.1192/bjo.2019.101.

Carers' experiences of involuntary admission under mental health legislation: systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis

Ruth Stuart  1 , Syeda Ferhana Akther  2 , Karen Machin  3 , Karen Persaud  4 , Alan Simpson  5 , Sonia Johnson  6 , Sian Oram  7
Affiliations

Carers' experiences of involuntary admission under mental health legislation: systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis

Ruth Stuart et al. BJPsych Open. .

Abstract

Background: Carers are key providers of care and support to mental health patients and mental health policies consistently mandate carer involvement. Understanding carers' experiences of and views about assessment for involuntary admission and subsequent detention is crucial to efforts to improve policy and practice.

Aims: We aimed to synthesise qualitative evidence of carers' experiences of the assessment and detention of their family and friends under mental health legislation.

Method: We searched five bibliographic databases, reference lists and citations. Studies were included if they collected data using qualitative methods and the patients were aged 18 or older; reported on carer experiences of assessment or detention under mental health legislation anywhere in the world; and were published in peer-reviewed journals. We used meta-synthesis.

Results: The review included 23 papers. Themes were consistent across time and setting and related to the emotional impact of detention; the availability of support for carers; the extent to which carers felt involved in decision-making; relationships with patients and staff during detention; and the quality of care provided to patients. Carers often described conflicting feelings of relief coupled with distress and anxiety about how the patient might cope and respond. Carers also spoke about the need for timely and accessible information, supportive and trusting relationships with mental health professionals, and of involvement as partners in care.

Conclusions: Research is needed to explore whether and how health service and other interventions can improve the involvement and support of carers prior to, during and after the detention of family members and friends.

Keywords: Systematic review; carers; involuntary admission; meta-synthesis; qualitative.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interest: None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow chart detailing number of included studies.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Fleury MJ, Grenier G, Caron J, Lesage A. Patients’ report of help provided by relatives and services to meet their needs. Community Ment Health J 2008; 44: 271–81. - PubMed
    1. Tempier R, Balbuena L, Lepnurm M, Craig TK. Perceived emotional support in remission: results from an 18-month follow-up of patients with early episode psychosis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2013; 48: 1897–904. - PubMed
    1. Scofield N, Quinn J, Haddock G, Barrowclough C. Schizophrenia and substance misuse problems: a comparison between patients with and without significant carer contact. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2001; 36: 523–8. - PubMed
    1. Norman RM, Malla AK, Manchanda R, Harricharan R, Takhar J, Northcott S. Social support and three-year symptom and admission outcomes for first episode psychosis. Schizophr Res 2005; 80: 227–34. - PubMed
    1. Australian Government. Carer Recognition Act 2010 Australian Government, 2010.