Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug;44(8):E313-E325.
doi: 10.1111/aor.13665. Epub 2020 Mar 8.

Ventricular arrhythmias following continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation: A systematic review

Affiliations

Ventricular arrhythmias following continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation: A systematic review

Jonathan S Gordon et al. Artif Organs. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) are not uncommon after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation. In this systematic review, we sought to identify the patterns of VA that occurred following CF-LVAD implantation and evaluate their outcomes. An electronic search was performed to identify all articles reporting the development of VA following CF-LVAD implantation. VA was defined as any episode of ventricular fibrillation (VF) or sustained (>30 seconds) ventricular tachycardia (VT). Eleven studies were pooled for the analysis that included 393 CF-LVAD patients with VA. The mean patient age was 57 years [95%CI: 54; 61] and 82% [95%CI: 73; 88] were male. Overall, 37% [95%CI: 19; 60] of patients experienced a new onset VA after CF-LVAD implantation, while 60% [95%CI: 51; 69] of patients had a prior history of VA. Overall, 88% of patients [95%CI: 78; 94] were supported on HeartMate II CF-LVAD, 6% [95%CI: 3; 14] on HeartWare HVAD, and 6% [95%CI: 2; 13] on other CF-LVADs. VA was symptomatic in 47% [95%CI: 28; 68] of patients and in 50% [95%CI: 37; 52], early VA (<30 days from CF-LVAD) was observed. The 30-day mortality rate was 7% [95%CI: 5; 11]. Mean follow-up was 22.9 months [95%CI: 4.8; 40.8], during which 27% [95%CI: 17; 39] of patients underwent heart transplantation. In conclusion, approximately a third of patients had new VA following CF-LVAD placement. VA in CF-LVAD patients is often symptomatic, necessitates treatment, and carries a worse prognosis.

Keywords: catheter ablation; continuous-flow left ventricle assist device; left ventricle assist device; ventricular arrhythmia; ventricular assist device; ventricular tachycardia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Adams EE, Wrightson ML. Quality of life with an LVAD: a misunderstood concept. Heart Lung. 2018 May;47:177-83.
    1. Guzman-Gutierrez G, Shi Y, Rappelt M, Jahangir A, Thohan V. Advanced heart failure treatment options among the elderly. J Patient-cent Res Rev. 2016 Nov;3:199-206.
    1. Rodrigo ME, Molina EJ, Majure DT, Sheikh FH, Hofmeyer MR, Ruiz G, et al. Preliminary single-center experience with left anterior mini-thoracotomy for continuous-flow LVAD implantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Apr;33:S202.
    1. Greet BD, Pujara D, Burkland D, Pollet M, Sudhakar D, Rojas F, et al. Incidence, predictors, and significance of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a 15-year institutional experience. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Feb;4:257-64.
    1. Kormos RL, Cowger J, Pagani FD, Teuteberg JJ, Goldstein DJ, Jacobs JP, et al. The society of thoracic surgeons intermacs database annual report: evolving indications, outcomes, and scientific partnerships. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Feb;107:341-53.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources