Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jul;11(4):e1525.
doi: 10.1002/wcs.1525. Epub 2020 Feb 11.

Cognitive science as complexity science

Luis H Favela  1
Affiliations
Review

Cognitive science as complexity science

Luis H Favela. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

It is uncontroversial to claim that cognitive science studies many complex phenomena. What is less acknowledged are the contradictions among many traditional commitments of its investigative approaches and the nature of cognitive systems. Consider, for example, methodological tensions that arise due to the fact that like most natural systems, cognitive systems are nonlinear; and yet, traditionally cognitive science has relied on linear statistical data analyses. Cognitive science as complexity science is offered as an interdisciplinary framework for the investigation of cognition that can dissolve such contradictions and tensions. Here, cognition is treated as exhibiting the following four key features: emergence, nonlinearity, self-organization, and universality. This framework integrates concepts, methods, and theories from such disciplines as systems theory, nonlinear dynamical systems theory, and synergetics. By adopting this approach, the cognitive sciences benefit from a common set of practices to investigate, explain, and understand cognition in its varied and complex forms. This article is categorized under: Computer Science > Neural Networks Psychology > Theory and Methods Philosophy > Foundations of Cognitive Science Neuroscience > Cognition.

Keywords: complexity; emergence; nonlinearity; self-organization; universality.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Abrahamsen, A., & Bechtel, W. (2012). History and core themes. In K. Frankish & W. M. Ramsey (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of cognitive science (pp. 9-28). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    1. Adams, F. (1999). Cybernetics. In R. Audi (Ed.), The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy (2nd ed., pp. 199-200). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    1. Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2008). The bounds of cognition. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    1. Agazzi, E., & Montecucco, L. (Eds.). (2002). Complexity and emergence. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific.
    1. Aks, D. J., Zelinsky, G. J., & Sprott, J. C. (2002). Memory across eye-movements: 1/f dynamic in visual search. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 6, 1-25.

LinkOut - more resources