Deer, wolves, and people: costs, benefits and challenges of living together
- PMID: 32043747
- DOI: 10.1111/brv.12587
Deer, wolves, and people: costs, benefits and challenges of living together
Abstract
Human-driven species annihilations loom as a major crisis. However the recovery of deer and wolf populations in many parts of the northern hemisphere has resulted in conflicts and controversies rather than in relief. Both species interact in complex ways with their environment, each other, and humans. We review these interactions in the context of the ecological and human costs and benefits associated with these species. We integrate scattered information to widen our perspective on the nature and perception of these costs and benefits and how they link to each other and ongoing controversies regarding how we manage deer and wolf populations. After revisiting the ecological roles deer and wolves play in contemporary ecosystems, we explore how they interact, directly and indirectly, with human groups including farmers, foresters, shepherds, and hunters. Interactions with deer and wolves generate various axes of tension, posing both ecological and sociological challenges. Resolving these tensions and conflicts requires that we address key questions using integrative approaches: what are the ecological consequences of deer and wolf recovery? How do they influence each other? What are the social and socio-ecological consequences of large deer populations and wolf presence? Finally, what key obstacles must be overcome to allow deer, wolves and people to coexist? Reviewing contemporary ecological and sociological results suggests insights and ways to improve our understanding and resolve long-standing challenges to coexistence. We should begin by agreeing to enhance aggregate benefits while minimizing the collective costs we incur by interacting with deer and wolves. We should also view these species, and ourselves, as parts of integrated ecosystems subject to long-term dynamics. If co-existence is our goal, we need deer and wolves to persevere in ways that are compatible with human interests. Our human interests, however, should be inclusive and fairly value all the costs and benefits deer and wolves entail including their intrinsic value. Shifts in human attitudes and cultural learning that are already occurring will reshape our ecological interactions with deer and wolves.
Keywords: carnivores; ecological cascades; herbivores; human health; human-wildlife conflict; livestock.
© 2020 Cambridge Philosophical Society.
Similar articles
-
Wolves make roadways safer, generating large economic returns to predator conservation.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 1;118(22):e2023251118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2023251118. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021. PMID: 34031245 Free PMC article.
-
Elk migration patterns and human activity influence wolf habitat use in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.Ecol Appl. 2012 Dec;22(8):2293-307. doi: 10.1890/11-1829.1. Ecol Appl. 2012. PMID: 23387126
-
Ungulate predation and ecological roles of wolves and coyotes in eastern North America.Ecol Appl. 2017 Apr;27(3):718-733. doi: 10.1002/eap.1499. Epub 2017 Mar 15. Ecol Appl. 2017. PMID: 28064464
-
Chronic wasting disease of cervids.Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2004;284:193-214. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-08441-0_8. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2004. PMID: 15148993 Review.
-
Living with wolves: A worldwide systematic review of attitudes.Ambio. 2024 Oct;53(10):1414-1432. doi: 10.1007/s13280-024-02036-1. Epub 2024 Jun 4. Ambio. 2024. PMID: 38833186 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Non-zoonotic tick-borne pathogens in Western Balkan.Parasit Vectors. 2025 Mar 14;18(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13071-025-06740-z. Parasit Vectors. 2025. PMID: 40087740 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The global biomass of wild mammals.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Mar 7;120(10):e2204892120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2204892120. Epub 2023 Feb 27. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023. PMID: 36848563 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence gaps and diversity among potential win-win solutions for conservation and human infectious disease control.Lancet Planet Health. 2022 Aug;6(8):e694-e705. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00148-6. Lancet Planet Health. 2022. PMID: 35932789 Free PMC article.
-
The late-Quaternary megafauna extinctions: Patterns, causes, ecological consequences and implications for ecosystem management in the Anthropocene.Camb Prism Extinct. 2024 Mar 22;2:e5. doi: 10.1017/ext.2024.4. eCollection 2024. Camb Prism Extinct. 2024. PMID: 40078803 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Same place, different time, head up: Multiple antipredator responses to a recolonizing apex predator.Curr Zool. 2022 Oct 26;69(6):703-717. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoac083. eCollection 2023 Dec. Curr Zool. 2022. PMID: 37876645 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- [Correction added on 13 April 2020, after Online publication: The reference Allen & Grosvenor, 1974 has been deleted and the reference Hampton, 1997 has been added in this version]
-
- Adler, G. H., Telford, S. R., Wilson, M. L. & Spielman, A. (1992). Vegetation structure influences the burden of immature Ixodes dammini on its main host, Peromyscus leucopus. Parasitology 105, 105-110.
-
- Albert, A., Auffret, A. G., Cosyns, E., Cousins, S. A., D'hondt, B., Eichberg, C., Eycott, A. E., Heinken, T., Hoffmann, M. & Jaroszewicz, B. (2015). Seed dispersal by ungulates as an ecological filter: a trait-based meta-analysis. Oikos 124, 1109-1120.
-
- Allan, B. F., Keesing, F. & Ostfeld, R. S. (2003). Effect of forest fragmentation on Lyme disease risk. Conservation Biology 17, 267-272.
-
- Alleau, J. & Linnell, J. D. (2015). The Story of a Man-Eating Beast in Dauphiné, France (1746-1756). In A Fairytale in Question: Historical Interactions between Humans and Wolves (eds. P. Masius and J. Sprenger. The White Horse Press, Isle of Harris.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources