Validity and Reliability of the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale-Thai Version (MDAS-T) for Assessment of Delirium in Palliative Care Patients
- PMID: 32043769
- PMCID: PMC7011635
- DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0399
Validity and Reliability of the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale-Thai Version (MDAS-T) for Assessment of Delirium in Palliative Care Patients
Abstract
Background: Delirium, a neuropsychiatric syndrome that occurs throughout medical illness trajectories, is frequently misdiagnosed. The Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS) is a commonly used tool in palliative care (PC) settings. Our objective was to establish and validate the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale-Thai version (MDAS-T) in PC patients.
Materials and methods: The MDAS was translated into Thai. Content validity, inter-rater reliability, and internal consistency were explored. The construct validity of the MDAS-T was analyzed using exploratory factor analysis. Instrument testing of the MDAS-T, the Thai version of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU-T), and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition as the gold standard was performed. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal cutoff score. The duration of each assessment was recorded.
Results: The study enrolled 194 patients. The content validity index was 0.97. The intraclass correlation coefficient and Cronbach's α coefficient were 0.98 and 0.96, respectively. A principal component analysis indicated a homogeneous, one-factor structure. The area under the ROC curve was 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-0.99). The best combination of sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) of the MDAS-T were 0.92 (0.85-0.96) and 0.90 (0.82-0.94), respectively, with a cutoff score of 9, whereas the CAM-ICU-T yielded 0.58 (0.48-0.67) and 0.98 (0.93-0.99), respectively. The median MDAS-T assessment time was 5 minutes.
Conclusion: This study established and validated the MDAS-T as a good and feasible tool for delirium screening and severity rating in PC settings.
Implications for practice: Delirium is prevalent in palliative care (PC) settings and causes distress to patients and families, thereby making delirium screening necessary. This study found that the MDAS-T is a highly objective and feasible test for delirium screening and severity monitoring in PC settings and can greatly improve the quality of care for this population.
Keywords: Delirium; MDAS; Palliative care; Screening; Sensitivity and specificity; Validity and reliability.
© 2019 The Authors. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of AlphaMed Press.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Validating the Mandarin version of the Memorial delirium assessment scale in general medical hospital patients.Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2022 Mar;14(1):e12468. doi: 10.1111/appy.12468. Epub 2021 Apr 12. Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 33847072
-
Using the Chinese version of Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale to describe postoperative delirium after hip surgery.Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 Nov 5;6:297. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00297. eCollection 2014. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 25414664 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical utility, factor analysis, and further validation of the memorial delirium assessment scale in patients with advanced cancer: Assessing delirium in advanced cancer.Cancer. 2000 Jun 15;88(12):2859-67. Cancer. 2000. PMID: 10870073
-
The measurement of delirium: review of scales.Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2003 Fall;17(3):207-24. doi: 10.1891/rtnp.17.3.207.53186. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2003. PMID: 14655974 Review.
-
Evaluating the Chinese versions of delirium assessment scales: a diagnostic systematic review.BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 28;25(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06745-z. BMC Psychiatry. 2025. PMID: 40296051 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Accuracy of Delirium Screening Tools in Older People with Cancer-A Systematic Review.Cancers (Basel). 2023 May 17;15(10):2807. doi: 10.3390/cancers15102807. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37345143 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The prevalence, associated factors, clinical impact, and state of diagnosis of delirium in palliative care patients.Support Care Cancer. 2021 Dec;29(12):7949-7956. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06367-7. Epub 2021 Jul 2. Support Care Cancer. 2021. PMID: 34213642 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Melatonin on Delirium After on-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Iran J Med Sci. 2021 Mar;46(2):120-127. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2020.82860.1146. Iran J Med Sci. 2021. PMID: 33753956 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The Confusion Assessment Method Could Be More Accurate than the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale for Diagnosing Delirium in Older Cancer Patients: An Exploratory Study.Curr Oncol. 2023 Sep 6;30(9):8245-8254. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30090598. Curr Oncol. 2023. PMID: 37754513 Free PMC article.
-
Detecting delirium in Parkinson's disease: an evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of bedside tools.Age Ageing. 2025 Jul 1;54(7):afaf197. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf197. Age Ageing. 2025. PMID: 40684269 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lawlor PG, Fainsinger RL, Bruera ED. Delirium at the end of life: Critical issues in clinical practice and research. JAMA 2000;284:2427–2429. - PubMed
-
- Duppils GS, Wikblad K. Patients’ experiences of being delirious. J Clin Nurs 2007;16:810–818. - PubMed
-
- Blazer DG, van Nieuwenhuizen AO. Evidence for the diagnostic criteria of delirium: An update. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2012;25:239–243. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical