Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Feb;25(2):e214-e222.
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0446. Epub 2019 Oct 14.

De Novo Versus Recurrent HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Patient Characteristics, Treatment, and Survival from the SystHERs Registry

Affiliations
Observational Study

De Novo Versus Recurrent HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Patient Characteristics, Treatment, and Survival from the SystHERs Registry

Debu Tripathy et al. Oncologist. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Limited data exist describing real-world treatment of de novo and recurrent HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Materials and methods: The Systemic Therapies for HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Study (SystHERs) was a fully enrolled (2012-2016), observational, prospective registry of patients with HER2-positive MBC. Patients aged ≥18 years and ≤6 months from HER2-positive MBC diagnosis were treated and assessed per their physician's standard practice. The primary endpoint was to characterize treatment patterns by de novo versus recurrent MBC status, compared descriptively. Secondary endpoints included patient characteristics, progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS, by Kaplan-Meier method; hazard ratio [HR] and 95% confidence interval [CI] by Cox regression), and patient-reported outcomes.

Results: Among 977 eligible patients, 49.8% (n = 487) had de novo and 50.2% (n = 490) had recurrent disease. A higher proportion of de novo patients had hormone receptor-negative disease (34.9% vs. 24.9%), bone metastasis (57.1% vs. 45.9%), and/or liver metastasis (41.9% vs. 33.1%), and a lower proportion had central nervous system metastasis (4.3% vs. 13.5%). De novo patients received first-line regimens containing chemotherapy (89.7%), trastuzumab (95.7%), and pertuzumab (77.8%) more commonly than recurrent patients (80.0%, 85.9%, and 68.6%, respectively). De novo patients had longer median PFS (17.7 vs. 11.9 months; HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.59-0.80; p < .0001) and OS (not estimable vs. 44.5 months; HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44-0.69; p < .0001).

Conclusion: Patients with de novo versus recurrent HER2-positive MBC exhibit different disease characteristics and survival durations, suggesting these groups have distinct outcomes. These differences may affect future clinical trial design. Clinical trial identification number. NCT01615068 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Implications for practice: SystHERs was an observational registry of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC), which is a large, modern, real-world data set for this population and, thereby, provides a unique opportunity to study patients with de novo and recurrent HER2-positive MBC. In SystHERs, patients with de novo disease had different baseline demographics and disease characteristics, had superior clinical outcomes, and more commonly received first-line chemotherapy and/or trastuzumab versus those with recurrent disease. Data from this and other studies suggest that de novo and recurrent MBC have distinct outcomes, which may have implications for disease management strategies and future clinical study design.

Keywords: De novo; HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer; Recurrent; Registry; SystHERs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Survival by de novo versus recurrent metastatic breast cancer. (A): Progression‐free survival. (B): Overall survival. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; NE, not estimable; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression‐free survival.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mariotto AB, Etzioni R, Hurlbert M et al. Estimation of the number of women living with metastatic breast cancer in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017;26:809–815. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Howlader N, Altekruse SF, Li CI et al. US incidence of breast cancer subtypes defined by joint hormone receptor and HER2 status. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014;106:dju055. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dawood S, Broglio K, Buzdar AU et al. Prognosis of women with metastatic breast cancer by HER2 status and trastuzumab treatment: An institutional‐based review. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:92–98. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dawood S, Broglio K, Ensor J et al. Survival differences among women with de novo stage IV and relapsed breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2010;21:2169–2174. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lobbezoo DJ, van Kampen RJ, Voogd AC et al. Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer: Are there differences between patients with de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer? Br J Cancer 2015;112:1445–1451. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data