Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb;25(2):91-93.
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0464. Epub 2019 Nov 19.

Statistical Test/Estimation Methods Used in Contemporary Phase III Cancer Randomized Controlled Trials with Time-to-Event Outcomes

Affiliations

Statistical Test/Estimation Methods Used in Contemporary Phase III Cancer Randomized Controlled Trials with Time-to-Event Outcomes

Hajime Uno et al. Oncologist. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

There exist a wide variety of statistical methods for clinical trials. Despite decades of clinical trial research, little is known about which methods are used in data analysis practice of the real world. This review describes the evidence of existing practices on survival data analysis and identifies potential opportunities to improve them.

Keywords: Interpretability; Robustness; Survival data analysis; Test/estimation coherency; Treatment decision making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Disposition of papers. “Not primary manuscript” includes ad hoc subgroup analyses, reports of correlative studies (e.g., quality of life data), reports of analysis of prognostic factors, prediction modeling, results of long‐term follow‐up data, and so on. Abbreviations: DFS, disease‐free survival; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression‐free survival.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cox DR. Regression models and life‐tables. J Royal Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 1972;34:187–220.
    1. Fleming TR, Harrington DP. Counting Processes and Survival Analysis. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 1991.
    1. Uno H, Claggett B, Tian L et al. Moving beyond the hazard ratio in quantifying the between‐group difference in survival analysis. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:2380–2385. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Uno H, Wittes J, Fu H et al. Alternatives to hazard ratios for comparing the efficacy or safety of therapies in noninferiority studies. Ann Intern Med 2015;163:127–134. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Horiguchi M, Hassett MJ, Uno H. How do the accrual pattern and follow‐up duration affect the hazard ratio estimate when the proportional hazards assumption is violated? The Oncologist 2019;24:867–871. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types