Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 May;29(5):721-733.
doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8027. Epub 2020 Feb 11.

Turning Chutes into Ladders for Women Faculty: A Review and Roadmap for Equity in Academia

Affiliations
Review

Turning Chutes into Ladders for Women Faculty: A Review and Roadmap for Equity in Academia

Michelle I Cardel et al. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 May.

Abstract

Despite significant progress in recent decades, the recruitment, advancement, and promotion of women in academia remain low. Women represent a large portion of the talent pool in academia, and receive >50% of all PhDs, but this has not yet translated into sustained representation in faculty and leadership positions. Research indicates that women encounter numerous "chutes" that remove them from academia or provide setbacks to promotion at all stages of their careers. These include the perception that women are less competent and their outputs of lesser quality, implicit bias in teaching evaluations and grant funding decisions, and lower citation rates. This review aims to (1) synthesize the "chutes" that impede the careers of women faculty, and (2) provide feasible recommendations, or "ladders" for addressing these issues at all career levels. Enacting policies that function as "ladders" rather than "chutes" for academic women is essential to even the playing field, achieve gender equity, and foster economic, societal, and cultural benefits of academia.

Keywords: gender equity; implicit bias; pay gap.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
A roadmap for equity in academia. Color images are available online.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Employment outcomes of men and women who started as science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) professionals employed full-time in 2003 and then had their first child between 2003 and 2006 and did not have another child between 2006 and 2010 (N = 532). Redrawn with permission from Cech and Blair-Loy. Color images are available online.

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Agriculture: Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2015
    1. Okahana H, Zhou E. Graduate Enrollment and Degrees: 2007 to 2017. Council of Graduate Schools. Washington, DC, 2018
    1. National Center for Education Statistics IDC. Full-time instructional staff, by faculty and tenure status, academic rank, race/ethnicity, and gender (degree-granting institutions): Fall 2015. Fall Staff 2015 Survey, 2016
    1. Moss-Racusin CA, Dovidio JF, Brescoll VL, Graham MJ, Handelsman J. Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012;109:16474–16479 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mengel F, Sauermann J, Zölitz U. Gender bias in teaching evaluations. J Eur Econ Assoc 2018;17:jvx057–jvx057

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources