Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Oct;21(8):645-653.
doi: 10.1089/sur.2019.314. Epub 2020 Feb 11.

Current Clinical Methods for Detection of Peri-Prosthetic Joint Infection

Affiliations
Review

Current Clinical Methods for Detection of Peri-Prosthetic Joint Infection

Ellis Berns et al. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Currently, one of the most pressing problems in the field of orthopedic surgery is peri-prosthetic joint infection [PJI]. While there are numerous ways to detect PJI, current clinical detection methods differ across institutions and have varying criteria and protocols. Some of these methods include the Modified Musculoskeletal Infection Society system, culturing, polymerase chain reaction, the determination of the presence of certain biomarkers, testing for the presence of alpha defensin peptides, and leukocyte level testing. Methods: This review summarizes the most recent publications in the field of PJI detection to highlight current strengths as well as provide future directions to find the system for the quickest, cost-effective, and most accurate way to diagnose these types of infections. Results: The results of this literature review suggest that, while each method of diagnosis has its advantages, each has various drawbacks as well. Current methods can be expensive, take days to weeks to complete, be prone to contamination, and can produce ambiguous results. Conclusions: The findings in this review emphasize the need for a more comprehensive and accurate system for diagnosing PJI. In addition, the specific comparison of advantages and drawbacks can be useful for researchers and clinicians with goals of creating new diagnostic tests for PJIs, as well as in clinical scenarios to determine the correct treatment for patients.

Keywords: implant; orthopedic infection; peri-prosthetic joint infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Garcia holds equity in BI Medical, LLC; Dr. Born, holds equity in BI Medical, LLC. and is a stock holder in BioIntraface, Inc, and Illuminoss, LLC. For the remaining authors, no competing financial interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sebastian S, Malhotra R, Dhawan B. Prosthetic joint infection: A major threat to successful total joint arthroplasty. Indian J Med Microbiol 2018;36:475–487. - PubMed
    1. Guan H, Fu J, Li X, et al. . The 2018 new definition of periprosthetic joint infection improves the diagnostic efficiency in the Chinese population. J Orthop Surg Res 2019;14:151. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kurtz SM, Lau E, Watson H, et al. . Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27(Suppl 8):61–65.e1. - PubMed
    1. Adams JR, Schwartz AJ. False-negative synovial alpha-defensin. Arthroplast Today 2017;3:239–241. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sigmund IK, Holinka J, Lang S, et al. A comparative study of intraoperative frozen section and alpha defensin lateral flow test in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. Acta - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources