Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 May 15;16(5):775-783.
doi: 10.5664/jcsm.8356. Epub 2020 Feb 11.

Effect of wearables on sleep in healthy individuals: a randomized crossover trial and validation study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of wearables on sleep in healthy individuals: a randomized crossover trial and validation study

Sarah Berryhill et al. J Clin Sleep Med. .

Abstract

Study objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a wearable sleep-tracker improves perceived sleep quality in healthy participants and to test whether wearables reliably measure sleep quantity and quality compared with polysomnography.

Methods: This study included a single-center randomized crossover trial of community-based participants without medical conditions or sleep disorders. A wearable device (WHOOP, Inc.) was used that provided feedback regarding sleep information to the participant for 1 week and maintained sleep logs versus 1 week of maintained sleep logs alone. Self-reported daily sleep behaviors were documented in sleep logs. Polysomnography was performed on 1 night when wearing the wearable. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System sleep disturbance sleep scale was measured at baseline, day 7 and day 14 of study participation.

Results: In 32 participants (21 women; 23.8 ± 5 years), wearables improved nighttime sleep quality (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System sleep disturbance: B = -1.69; 95% confidence interval, -3.11 to -0.27; P = .021) after adjusting for age, sex, baseline, and order effect. There was a small increase in self-reported daytime naps when wearing the device (B = 3.2; SE, 1.4; P = .023), but total daily sleep remained unchanged (P = .43). The wearable had low bias (13.8 minutes) and precision (17.8 minutes) errors for measuring sleep duration and measured dream sleep and slow wave sleep accurately (intraclass coefficient, 0.74 ± 0.28 and 0.85 ± 0.15, respectively). Bias and precision error for heart rate (bias, -0.17%; precision, 1.5%) and respiratory rate (bias, 1.8%; precision, 6.7%) were very low compared with that measured by electrocardiogram and inductance plethysmography during polysomnography.

Conclusions: In healthy people, wearables can improve sleep quality and accurately measure sleep and cardiorespiratory variables.

Clinical trial registration: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Assessment of Sleep by WHOOP in Ambulatory Subjects; Identifier: NCT03692195.

Keywords: sleep; sleep loss; sleep quality; sleep tracker; wearable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have seen and approved the manuscript. Work for this study was performed at University of Arizona. This study was funded by a grant to the University of Arizona from WHOOP Inc., Boston, Massachusetts. The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. CONSORT diagram of flow pf participants through the randomized crossover clinical trial.
PSG = polysomnography.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Heart rate variability and strain.
Heart rate variability (top) and strain (a measure of physical activity derived from heart rate; bottom) are shown for women (green symbols) and men (red symbols). During the 7 days of wearing the device, heart rate variability measured by the device increased over time (top right; black symbols; P = .01), and there were no sex differences, whereas physical activity increased in men but not in women (bottom).

Comment in

References

    1. Ko PR, Kientz JA, Choe EK, Kay M, Landis CA, Watson NF. Consumer sleep technologies: a review of the landscape. J Clin Sleep Med. 2015;11(12):1455–146110.5664/jcsm.5288 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. DiClemente CC, Marinilli AS, Singh M, Bellino LE. The role of feedback in the process of health behavior change. Am J Health Behav. 2001;25(3):217–22710.5993/AJHB.25.3.8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miller JD, Najafi B, Armstrong DG. Current standards and advances in diabetic ulcer prevention and elderly fall prevention using wearable technology. Curr Geriatr Rep. 2015;4(3):249–25610.1007/s13670-015-0136-7 - DOI
    1. Aminian K, Najafi B. Capturing human motion using body‐fixed sensors: outdoor measurement and clinical applications. Comput Animat Virtual Worlds. 2004;15(2):79–9410.1002/cav.2 - DOI
    1. Mantua J, Gravel N, Spencer RM. Reliability of sleep measures from four personal health monitoring devices compared to research-based actigraphy and polysomnography. Sensors (Basel). 2016;16(5):646.10.3390/s16050646 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data