Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 11;323(6):538-547.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.21463.

Out-of-Network Bills for Privately Insured Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery With In-Network Primary Surgeons and Facilities

Affiliations

Out-of-Network Bills for Privately Insured Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery With In-Network Primary Surgeons and Facilities

Karan R Chhabra et al. JAMA. .

Abstract

Importance: Privately insured patients who receive care from in-network physicians may receive unexpected out-of-network bills ("surprise bills") from out-of-network clinicians they did not choose. In elective surgery, this can occur if patients choose in-network surgeons and hospitals but receive out-of-network bills from other involved clinicians.

Objective: To evaluate out-of-network billing across common elective operations performed with in-network primary surgeons and facilities.

Design, setting, and participants: Retrospective analysis of claims data from a large US commercial insurer, representing 347 356 patients who had undergone 1 of 7 common elective operations (arthroscopic meniscal repair [116 749]; laparoscopic cholecystectomy [82 372]; hysterectomy [67 452]; total knee replacement [42 313]; breast lumpectomy [18 018]; colectomy [14 074]; coronary artery bypass graft surgery [6378]) by an in-network primary surgeon at an in-network facility between January 1, 2012, and September 30, 2017. Follow-up ended November 8, 2017.

Exposure: Patient, clinician, and insurance factors potentially related to out-of-network bills.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of episodes with out-of-network bills. The secondary outcome was the estimated potential balance bill associated with out-of-network bills from each surgical procedure, calculated as total out-of-network charges less the typical in-network price for the same service.

Results: Among 347 356 patients (mean age, 48 [SD, 11] years; 66% women) who underwent surgery with in-network primary surgeons and facilities, 20.5% of episodes (95% CI, 19.4%-21.7%) had an out-of-network bill. In these episodes, the mean potential balance bill per episode was $2011 (95% CI, $1866-$2157) when present. Out-of-network bills were associated with surgical assistants in 37% of these episodes; when present, the mean potential balance bill was $3633 (95% CI, $3384-$3883). Out-of-network bills were associated with anesthesiologists in 37% of episodes; when present, the mean potential balance bill was $1219 (95% CI, $1049-$1388). Membership in health insurance exchange plans, compared with nonexchange plans, was associated with a significantly higher risk of out-of-network bills (27% vs 20%, respectively; risk difference, 6% [95% CI, 3.9%-8.9%]; P < .001). Surgical complications were associated with a significantly higher risk of out-of-network bills, compared with episodes with no complications (28% vs 20%, respectively; risk difference, 7% [95% CI, 5.8%-8.8%]; P < .001). Among 83 021 procedures performed at ambulatory surgery centers with in-network primary surgeons, 6.7% (95% CI, 5.8%-7.7%) included an out-of-network facility bill and 17.2% (95% CI, 15.7%-18.8%) included an out-of-network professional bill.

Conclusions and relevance: In this retrospective analysis of commercially insured patients who had undergone elective surgery at in-network facilities with in-network primary surgeons, a substantial proportion of operations were associated with out-of-network bills.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Dimick reported that he is a cofounder of ArborMetrix Inc, a company that makes software for profiling hospital quality and efficiency. No other authors reported disclosures.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Geographic Variation in Rates of Out-of-Network Bills, by State
Out-of-network billing rates represent a frequency-weighted mean across 7 procedures, chosen to represent a diverse range of specialties and both ambulatory and inpatient settings: arthroscopic meniscal repair, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, hysterectomy, total knee replacement, breast lumpectomy, colectomy, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Episodes were defined as beginning on the day of surgery and ending at the end of the surgical confinement. These out-of-network billing rates were conditional on the primary surgeon and facility being in-network. Bills came primarily from surgical assistants, anesthesiologists, pathologists, medical consultants, and radiologists.

Comment in

References

    1. Haberkorn J. Surprise medical bills could prompt rare bipartisan action in Congress. Los Angeles Times https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-congress-surprise-medical-bil.... May 21, 2019. Accessed May 22, 2019.
    1. Sullivan P. Turf war derails bipartisan push on surprise medical bills. https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/474520-turf-war-derails-bipartisan.... Updated December 13, 2019. Accessed December 19, 2019.
    1. Bindman A. Curbing surprise medical bills can be a window into cost control. JAMA. 2018;320(20):2065-2066. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.17418 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cooper Z, Scott Morton F. Out-of-network emergency-physician bills—an unwelcome surprise. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(20):1915-1918. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1608571 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dekhne M, Adler L, Sheetz K, Chhabra K Federal policy to end surprise billing: building on prior approaches. Health Affairs Blog https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20190221.859328/full/. Published February 22, 2019. Accessed October 20, 2019. - DOI

Publication types