Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Feb 7;21(3):1096.
doi: 10.3390/ijms21031096.

Evaluation of the Use of Formalin-Fixed and Paraffin-Embedded Archive Gastric Tissues for Microbiota Characterization Using Next-Generation Sequencing

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of the Use of Formalin-Fixed and Paraffin-Embedded Archive Gastric Tissues for Microbiota Characterization Using Next-Generation Sequencing

Ines Pinto-Ribeiro et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Large numbers of well-characterized clinical samples are fundamental to establish relevant associations between the microbiota and disease. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues are routinely used and are widely available clinical materials. Since current approaches to study the microbiota are based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) targeting the bacterial 16S rRNA gene, our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of FFPE gastric tissues for NGS-based microbiota characterization. Analysis of sequencing data revealed the presence of bacteria in the paraffin control. After the subtraction of the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) present in the paraffin control to the FFPE tissue sample dataset, we evaluated the microbiota profiles between paired FFPE and frozen gastric tissues, and between different times of archiving. Compared with frozen gastric tissues, we detected a lower number of OTUs in the microbiota of paired FFPE tissues, regardless of the time of archiving. No major differences in microbial diversity were identified, but taxonomic variation in the relative abundance of phyla and orders was observed between the two preservation methods. This variation was also evident in each case and throughout the times of FFPE archiving. The use of FFPE tissues for NGS-based microbiota characterization should be considered carefully, as biases can be introduced by the embedding process and the time of tissue archiving.

Keywords: 16S rRNA gene; formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues; microbiota; next-generation sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Impact of the embedding of FFPE tissues on the microbiota characterization. (A) Number of OTUs of the paraffin control and all FFPE samples obtained after randomly subsampling to a fixed depth. (B) Microbial alpha-diversity assessed by the Shannon index. (C) Taxonomic profile at the phylum level discriminating the most abundant phyla in the paraffin control and all FFPE samples before and after (#) OTU subtraction. § stands for significantly different from all FFPE samples at p < 0.05. (D) Venn diagram showing the number OTUs common and exclusive to the paraffin control and FFPE samples.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of the microbiota profiles between frozen and FFPE tissues and between different times of FFPE tissue archiving (A) Number of OTUs in each group of samples. (B) Microbial alpha-diversity assessed by the Shannon index. (C) Microbial beta-diversity calculated by the weighted UniFrac distances. (D) Relative abundance of phyla in frozen tissues, all FFPE tissue samples, and FFPE tissues archived for 6, 12, and 18 months. ¥ and * stand for significantly different from frozen tissues at p < 0.05.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Marchesi J.R., Ravel J. The vocabulary of microbiome research: A proposal. Microbiome. 2015;3:31. doi: 10.1186/s40168-015-0094-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huttenhower C., Gevers D., Knight R., Abubucker S., Badger J.H., Chinwalla A.T., Creasy H.H., Earl A.M., FitzGerald M.G., Fulton R.S., et al. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature. 2012;486:207–214. doi: 10.1038/nature11234. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lloyd-Price J., Arze C., Ananthakrishnan A.N., Schirmer M., Avila-Pacheco J., Poon T.W., Andrews E., Ajami N.J., Bonham K.S., Brislawn C.J., et al. Multi-omics of the gut microbial ecosystem in inflammatory bowel diseases. Nature. 2019;569:655–662. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1237-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maruvada P., Leone V., Kaplan L.M., Chang E.B. The Human Microbiome and Obesity: Moving beyond Associations. Cell Host Microbe. 2017;22:589–599. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.10.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferreira R.M., Pereira-Marques J., Pinto-Ribeiro I., Costa J.L., Carneiro F., Machado J.C., Figueiredo C. Gastric microbial community profiling reveals a dysbiotic cancer-associated microbiota. Gut. 2018;67:226–236. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314205. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources