Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Feb 11;20(1):95.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2774-9.

Evaluation of emergency obstetric and neonatal care services in Kumba Health District, Southwest region, Cameroon (2011-2014): a before-after study

Reine Suzanne Kadia  1 , Benjamin Momo Kadia  2 , Christian Akem Dimala  3 , Desmond Aroke  3 , Noel Vogue  4 , Bruno Kenfack  4
Affiliations

Evaluation of emergency obstetric and neonatal care services in Kumba Health District, Southwest region, Cameroon (2011-2014): a before-after study

Reine Suzanne Kadia et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: There is uncertainty regarding the status of emergency obstetric and neonatal care (EmONC) in the Cameroonian context where maternal and neonatal mortality are persistently high. This study sought to evaluate the coverage, functionality and quality of EmONC services in Kumba health district (KHD), the largest health district in Southwest Cameroon..

Methods: A retrospective study of routine EmONC data for the periods 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2012 (when EmONC was being introduced) and 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2014 (when EmONC was fully instituted) was conducted. Coverage, functionality and quality of EmONC services were graded as per United Nations (UN) standards. Data was analysed using Epi-Info version 7 statistical software.

Results: Among the 31 health facilities in KHD, 12 (39%) had been delivering EmONC services. Three (25%) of these were geographically inaccessible Among the 9 facilities that were assessed, 4 facilities (44%) performed designated signal functions, with 2 being comprehensive (CEmONC) and 2 basic (BEmONC). These exceeded the required minimum of 2.8 EmONC facilities/500000, 0.6 CEmONC facilities/500000 and 2.2 BEmONC facilities/500000, with reference to an estimated KHD population of 265,071. The signal functions that were least likely to be performed were neonatal resuscitation, manual evacuation of retained products and use of anticonvulsants. In 2011-2012, the facilities performed 35% of expected deliveries. This dropped to 28% in 2013-2014. Caesarean sections as a proportion of expected deliveries remained very low: 1.5% in 2010-2011 and 3.6% in 2013-2014. In 2011-2012, met needs were 6.8% and increased to 7.3% in 2013-2014. Direct obstetric fatality rates increased from 8 to 11% (p = 0.64). Intrapartum and very early neonatal deaths increased from 4.% to 7 (p = 0.89).

Conclusion: Major gaps were observed in the performance of signal functions as well as the quality and utilization of EmONC. While the results of this study seem to indicate the need to sustainably scale up the utilization of quality EmONC, the interpretations of our findings require consideration of improvements in reporting of mortality data associated with the introduction of EmONC as well as dynamics in country-specific maternal health policies and the potential influence of these policies on EmONC indicators.

Keywords: Availability; Care; Emergency; Neonatal; Obstetric; Quality; Utilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Map of Kumba health district, its health areas and boundaries
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Types of health facilities practicing emergency obstetric and neonatal care in Kumba health district, 2011–2014
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Performance of signal functions by facilities providing emergency obstetric and neonatal care services in Kumba health district, 2011–2014
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Direct obstetric complications recorded in facilities providing emergency obstetric and neonatal care services in Kumba health district, 2011–2014
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Alkema Leontine, Chou Doris, Hogan Daniel, Zhang Sanqian, Moller Ann-Beth, Gemmill Alison, Fat Doris Ma, Boerma Ties, Temmerman Marleen, Mathers Colin, Say Lale. Global, regional, and national levels and trends in maternal mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group. The Lancet. 2016;387(10017):462–474. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00838-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990–2013; Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, The World Bank and the United Nations Population Division. Geneva: WHO; 2014.
    1. Say Lale, Chou Doris, Gemmill Alison, Tunçalp Özge, Moller Ann-Beth, Daniels Jane, Gülmezoglu A Metin, Temmerman Marleen, Alkema Leontine. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. The Lancet Global Health. 2014;2(6):e323–e333. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hogan Margaret C, Foreman Kyle J, Naghavi Mohsen, Ahn Stephanie Y, Wang Mengru, Makela Susanna M, Lopez Alan D, Lozano Rafael, Murray Christopher JL. Maternal mortality for 181 countries, 1980–2008: a systematic analysis of progress towards Millennium Development Goal 5. The Lancet. 2010;375(9726):1609–1623. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60518-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990–2015; Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, The World Bank and the United Nations Population Division. Geneva: WHO; 2015.

Publication types

MeSH terms